Free Site Registration

More Debits & Credits Posts

New Goodwill Impairment Standard Leaves Questions

By Michael Cohn
September 16, 2011

The new goodwill impairment testing standard may give companies more options and flexibility, but it also leaves some questions unanswered, according to one expert.

Greg Forsythe, director of business valuation at Deloitte Financial Advisory Services, noted that the new standard released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board on Thursday provides some companies with a way to avoid the need to do the traditional two-step test, which potentially could make things easier for them (see FASB Issues Goodwill Impairment Testing Standard).

“From FAS 142, way back in 2001, we’ve had a goodwill impairment test that we essentially refer to as a two-step test,” he said Friday. “We’ve had what is referred to as the reporting unit level within companies. Companies can have anywhere from one to many reporting units, and many with goodwill need to be tested. Essentially the process is you value that reporting unit, and if the reporting unit’s value is greater than their carrying value, then you’re fine, and you don’t need to do anything further. And if it happens to be less, then you need to go through step two, which is essentially a residual analysis to come up with an implied goodwill value. Then that number is compared with the actual goodwill on the balance sheet, and if your goodwill implied is less than what’s on the balance sheet, then you write off the difference. That’s historically what companies have done. As you can imagine, for companies with many reporting units, that can start to become a costly exercise, and there are a lot of things they need to do to effectuate it.”

FASB’s new Accounting Standards Update gives companies the option of doing a qualitative assessment first, he noted.  An entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. Depending upon whether or not they can prove, more likely than not, that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then the two-step test is required, but if they can prove that their fair value is higher, then they don’t need to go through the analytical two-step process. If they cannot prove that, then they need to go through the original evaluation process.

“In terms of the literature that comes out from the FASB, we’ve had a lot of thick documents on fair value in recent years, but this one it’s pretty skimpy in comparison, because it is fairly simple in concept,” Forsythe noted. “However, what’s simple in concept may have some complexity and challenges around it. I think that’s where everyone is right now, sort of trying to think through what this might mean, and what auditors might need to do to audit this kind of qualitative data, which is for the first time new in a fair value concept. There’s never been this kind of qualitative assessment under a fair value topic, and companies are wondering about whether it warrants taking this option or to continue to do what they’ve done in the past. So there are lots of questions being asked, but no real answers yet.”


Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Debits & Credits, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

Follow Accounting Today


Trends in the Accounting Profession

April 18, 2014

Jim Metzler, former AICPA vice president of small firm interests, and founder of Metzler Advisory Group, talks about how the CPA profession is changing.

Lessons in M&A: Client and Staff Retention

April 14, 2014

Transition Advisors president Joel Sinkin talks about what firms should do after a merger to retain their clients and staff members.

Are You Missing These Growth Opportunities?

April 2, 2014

Gale Crosley of Crosley + Company discusses the practice areas and international opportunities that firms often overlook in trying to grow.



Dumbest Employee Excuses for Being Late

March 31, 2014

Running a little late could have big repercussions, especially at a firm in the midst of busy season. From escaped zebras to must-see TV, employers told CareerBuilder some of the most memorable excuses they've heard from tardy employees.

Common Taxpayer Misconceptions

March 19, 2014

The NAEA’s collection of ridiculous things tax clients believe.

The 10 Fastest-Growing Firms in the U.S.

March 10, 2014

The firms with the highest 2013 revenue growth in our Top 100 Firms/Regional Leaders list.

Top 10 Tech Trends for 2014

March 3, 2014

As companies gain more affordable access to new technology and platforms, they also seek to make smarter investments.

Strangest Tax Deductions

January 31, 2014

The Minnesota Society of CPAs recently conducted its annual survey about the most strange and unusual tax deductions proposed by clients.