Free Site Registration


House Considers 1099 Repeal

Print
Email
Reprints
Washington, D.C. (February 14, 2011)

By Michael Cohn

The House Committee on Small Business held hearings on repealing the unpopular expansion of 1099 information reporting in the health care reform bill.

Dan Lungren

One of the topics for discussion during the hearing last Wednesday was a bill introduced by Rep. Dan Lungren, R- Calif., which would repeal the new 1099 reporting requirements. Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires that businesses and nonprofit organizations report on transactions totaling over $600 a year with any other business to the IRS.

Lungren noted that his bill, the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act, has attracted bipartisan support from 270 co-sponsors. Supporters include the chairman of the Small Business Committee, Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., and ranking member Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y.

Advertisement

"The new 1099 filing requirement is emblematic of the broader array of regulatory obstacles which add to the difficulty faced by small business owners who are just trying to survive," said Lungren. "This new government mandate only adds to the perceived burdens which lie ahead and raises what might best be described as an 'uncertainty tax.' If we want to encourage investment, hiring and business growth, we should be looking at ways to create an environment which is more friendly to entrepreneurship. In this regard, the new filing requirement is entirely a step in the wrong direction."

The House Ways and Means Committee plans to do a markup Thursday of Lungren’s bill, as well as another bill that goes further in repealing the 1099 requirements. The second bill, the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, would repeal the same 1099 requirements as the Lungren bill, as well as repeal an additional Form 1099 information reporting requirement on owners of rental real estate, and add an offset that would reduce improper overpayments of exchange subsidies established under the new health care law.

The Senate approved a repeal amendment earlier this month as part of a larger bill modernizing the Federal Aviation Administration (see Senate Passes 1099 Repeal Amendment). The Senate is still debating the larger FAA bill, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., hopes to get the bill passed this week.

“This new 1099 requirement will cause an avalanche of additional 1099 forms to be filed, and affect over 36 million entities,” Graves said at last week's hearing. “At a time when we should be making it easier to create jobs, promote growth and invest in our economy, small firms don’t need yet another costly and burdensome mandate. Although attempts were made last session to repeal the provision, those efforts were unsuccessful. We must repeal it immediately, so small businesses do not begin to devote scarce resources to compliance.”

Velázquez agreed that the provisions need to be repealed. “Small firms already spend 1.8 billion hours on tax compliance—and the new 1099 rules would add to that burden,” she said. “It also does little to limit tax avoidance as estimates have found it would improve tax compliance by only one-half percent.”

Several small business owners also testified before the committee. Jerol Kivett, the president of Kivett’s Incorporated, a family-run church pew manufacturing and refinishing business in Clinton, N.C., testified on behalf of the National Federation of Independent Business. “Tax filing is never a task small-business owners look forward to, but making filing more burdensome only drains resources from already struggling companies,” he said.

Seth Shipley, the owner of Shipley’s Diamonds and Fine Jewelry in Hampstead, Md., testified on behalf of the National Retail Federation. “My small store in rural Carroll County serves about 6,000 customers a year,” he said. “I estimate that more than 1,500 of those customers spend more than $600 a year in my store. According to the government website, it only takes 18 minutes for me to fill out a 1099 form. Even so, that means approximately 500 more hours of work will have to be devoted to filling out those forms for my customers by my estimate. In addition, I conduct transactions with about 200 jewelry suppliers each year and will invest more than $600 with each of them. That means an additional 60 hours of work to fill out those 1099 forms.”

In his State of the Union address, President Obama suggested that he supported fixing the controversial provisions. However, in the White House budget proposal for fiscal year 2012 that was released on Monday, only the expanded 1099 reporting requirements for purchases of goods would be repealed, but not for services totaling more than $600 per year paid to corporations.

6 Comments

Dan Lungren,

Thanks for your help and your work for small business.

Kyle Brink Brink Kanga Roof

Posted by: onarooftop | February 16, 2011 10:51 PM

Report this Comment


cma1994 I do not think you understand what kbrandt meant. If you are a fiscal year corporation with a June year end the 1099's you and the IRS receive for the 2011 year will cover payments for your June 2011 and June 2012 year so what they are saying is does the IRS have the brains/manpower to reconcile these issues and us tax preparers already know the answer to that is simply NO.

I also think you are being a bit shortsighted if you cannot realize that it is not just a matter of filing out a W-9 and having it pre-printed. What about individuals who receive payments of over $600. Let's say for example you own a coin shop and I come in and sell you a gold coin for $500. You now would have to make sure you have a system in place to track my sales to you because if I come back and sell you another coin for $100 or more you would have to 1099. So first thing you would have to track that, secondly and more importantly in this day in age, I would have to give you a W-9 which would have my name, address, and SSN. Now on the surface you probably say "so what that is pretty standard and simple" but think about it, I would now be giving that information to more and more people and that information which is supposed to be private and secure could easily fall into someone else's hands and then my ID can easily be stolen.

There are so many issues at play here that you have to make sure you think about as well. Not to mention just the burden you put on business who now have to report everything they spend money on. Think of your restaurant you go to, they now would have to report the purchase of all their inventory. Seems a bit unnecessary to me.

Posted by: tapout2taxes | February 15, 2011 12:34 PM

Report this Comment


The second bill that's scheduled for markup on Thursday, the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011, covers the rental property requirements.

Posted by: MikeCohn | February 15, 2011 10:46 AM

Report this Comment


So much hoopla about the 1099 requirements included in the Health Care bill... what about the requirements in place for rental property owners? Have I missed something? (If so, it sure wouldn't be the first time!)

Posted by: woodyled | February 15, 2011 10:34 AM

Report this Comment


Form 1099 information is calendar year based and not related to a business' fiscal year. There is no issue with overlapping years. In addition, the transactions reported on the Form 1099 are the amounts actually received/paid and not related to amounts invoiced or accrued.

The extra work for the new requirement is related to the sending, receiving back, and processing (setting up the vendors as 1099 vendors in the accounting software) the Form W-9 from your vendors. This would generate additional work in the year of implementaion. After the initial period, all that would need to be done is to send all new vendors the W-9 and process. The blank forms can be e-mailed or faxed and the completed forms can be mailed or faxed. For my business, I have a W-9 filled out with my information so that all I have to do is print it, sign it and fax it.

Posted by: cma1994 | February 15, 2011 10:05 AM

Report this Comment


The 1099 filing requirement was a very shortsighted concept hatched by individuals who have no clue as to how businesses operate. The requirement would generate a lot of useless information as many businesses are accrual based taxpayers so the 1099s would not reflect neither income nor expenses as reflected on these taxpayers tax returns. Additionally, many businesses have fiscal year ends other than December, so their 1099s would overlap two fiscal years and not match to anything. And the IRS says they could handle this??? Hmmm...

Posted by: kbrandt9000@aol.com | February 15, 2011 8:45 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's New at Grant Thornton

May 14, 2012

CEO Stephen Chipman talks about his firm's new brand focus on growth, and its recent M&A activity.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Payroll Mistakes Companies Make

May 14, 2012

Keeping your clients from running afoul of IRS rules around payroll taxes will help them avoid stiff penalties.

10 Years of the Top 100 Firms

May 6, 2012

Tracking trends at the biggest firms in the U.S.

Best Accounting Firm Taglines

April 27, 2012

Our favorite slogans from around the profession.

Favorite Busy Season Activities

April 10, 2012

LinkedIn Accounting members share the best methods to bust stress and boost morale.

The Best Places to Be an Accountant 2012

March 27, 2012

From our 2012 Regional Leaders list, we rank the best parts of the country to operate an accounting firm.

More Wacky Tax Deductions

March 26, 2012

LinkedIn members point out some weird tax deductions their clients have suggested.

7 Tax-Free Benefits for Employees

April 15, 2012

Employee rewards Uncle Sam can't touch.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement