Free Site Registration


IRS’s Level of Taxpayer Service Continues to Decline

Print
Email
Reprints
Washington, D.C. (January 17, 2013)

By Michael Cohn

The Internal Revenue Service faced challenges last tax season providing telephone service to taxpayers and responding to their correspondence, continuing the negative trends in recent years despite some efficiency gains and efforts to improve service, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office.

In 2012, 82 percent of individual taxpayers filed their returns electronically, reducing the IRS's processing costs. The IRS also increased calls answered using automated service and added a variety of self-service tools that helped provide greater efficiency.

However, the IRS's level of telephone service (the percentage of callers seeking live assistance who receive it) declined to 68 percent. In addition, of the 21 million pieces of paper correspondence received by the IRS, approximately 40 percent were considered overage (meaning that IRS did not respond within 45 days of receipt), an increase compared to last year.

While the IRS plans to continue to pursue efficiency gains, its strategy for future years does not specifically address how it plans to reverse these negative trends. Reversing the declines in telephone and correspondence services may require the IRS to consider difficult tradeoffs, the GAO report noted, such as reassessing which phone calls the IRS should answer with a live assistor and which it should not because automated services are available.

The tax filing season is an enormous undertaking, the GAO report acknowledged. The IRS needs to process millions of tax returns, issue billions of dollars in refunds, and provide service to millions of taxpayers over the phone, online and face-to-face. The IRS also needs to identify taxpayers who owe additional taxes and begins the process of collecting their balance due.

The GAO identified approximately 3.8 million returns in which taxpayers self-acknowledged a total balance due of $13.8 billion for tax year 2010, the most recent data available. During the IRS's notice phase, when the agency sends letters to taxpayers informing them how to pay the balance, the majority of this amount is either fully paid or accounted for through installment agreements.

However, at least $4.4 billion remained uncollected after the IRS sent as many as four notices to taxpayers. These amounts become subject to more costly collection actions, such as phone calls or face-to-face contact.

Best practices, such as risk-based approaches in which contacts are tailored to the taxpayer, have helped increase collections in states such as New York and California. The IRS has also developed an analytics plan and uses some risk-based processes to identify which notices taxpayers will receive. But the agency has not yet implemented the plan and management responsibilities are unclear. As a result, the IRS has not tested more advanced risk-based approaches. This may lead to delayed collection of taxpayer debt, higher costs for the IRS, and additional penalties for taxpayers who pay late.

The GAO recommended that the IRS outline a strategy to improve taxpayer service, define appropriate levels of service, and describe how it intends to manage performance declines; clearly define the roles and responsibilities of those reviewing the notice phase; and pilot risk-based approaches for contacting taxpayers who have a balance due.

In response to GAO's first recommendation, the IRS said it is pursuing several steps to improve service and described its plans to implement the other recommendations.

“While significant gains in taxpayer service and collection of taxes have been achieved, more can be done in some areas noted in your report,” wrote IRS Acting Commissioner Steven T. Miller in a statement. “For example, we are pursuing implementation of Advanced Consolidated Decision Analytics (ACDA), which will apply a risk-based approach to balance due returns, expediting taxpayer contact after the first notice. Successful implementation of ACDA will assist the IRS in collecting taxes due more efficiently and effectively.”

Miller added that the IRS plans to offer better customer service at the IRS by improving contact center efficiency, providing issue resolution alternatives to reduce customer demand, and equipping the workforce with productivity tools.

5 Comments

To bmpCPA: Check with Congress who keeps cutting the IRS budget, an organization that raises money for the Government, to give more money to their bribers/donors to support the "finest Congress that money can, and does, buy."

And with a bit of perseverance, and knowledge/reasoning, one can get the answers from the proper person/department at the IRS most times. Other than the "secretive" amended tax area.

Posted by: tego@verizon.net | January 20, 2013 5:08 PM

Report this Comment


If I'm not mistaken we as a country are seeking to create jobs right? Clearly the IRS needs people (not technology!) to fill the above concerns. So why do we not put our own people to work?!

Posted by: bmpCPA | January 19, 2013 11:00 AM

Report this Comment


No surprise in this report, although Shulman used to like to brag just the opposite, but he is gone now, so it must be someone else fault.

Posted by: Just Me | January 18, 2013 7:01 PM

Report this Comment


I would always start with the Practitioner priority Line, never the phone number on the notice. It's by no means perfect, but definitely an improvement.

Evan Appelman, EA

Posted by: evanapp@igc.org | January 18, 2013 12:35 PM

Report this Comment


My biggest headache in doing taxes is dealing with the IRS. My clients get notices which I answer by mail within the allotted deadline only to find the client getting demand notices and notices of levies a few weeks after. I then answer these notices and still no response. When we end up calling the IRS office at the number given on the notice, we end up on hold for at least a half an hour. Then we are told that there is no record of any of our correspondence that we sent to them even though we might have sent 3-4 letters to them. My last time around, I went in person to nearest IRS office (40 miles away), waited 30 minutes that got an agent that couldn't give us the answer. She was nice but definitely didn't belong in this department. She was to get back with us after she conferred with another agent that she said was more knowledgeable about the issue that she was. That was a month ago and we are still waiting for a call or letter. And that issue was simply getting the IRS to reinstate a $4,000 education credit that we had claimed and had the 1099 proof to back it up. I could go on and on. After doing taxes for nearly 50 years, I am about ready to call it quits. Also, why doesn't the IRS use the highest grade of tax software? I use CCH ProSystem fx tax that costs me around $5,000 each year. I was told by a retiring IRS agent last year that the IRS' software is not the top-of-line. Case in point: In the years 2009 and 2010, the IRS was issuing $400-$800 checks to taxpayers for the Making Work Pay Credit to were not entitled to them - Amish who are exempt from paying Social Security and considered by the IRS has having non-earned income if self employed. My software did not give them the credit; however, the IRS would turn around and send checks to taxpayers saying that there was an error on their returns. If you check on line, you will find that it wasn't limited to my area but all over the U.S., meaning the IRS issued thousands or possibly millions of refunds to taxpayers not entitled to them. Calls to IRS office to went to deaf ears. After explaining it for 30 minutes, they agreed but didn't proceed to correct the problem. Again, I could go on and on but no one seems to be listening or doing anything about it. Instead, us tax preparers are the ones that end up getting blamed.

Posted by: gowdy43 | January 18, 2013 12:14 PM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Women in Accounting: Where are the Leading Ladies?

May 17, 2013

Marcum’s Nanette Lee Miller and Janis Cowhey McDonagh sat down with managing editor Tamika Cody to discuss some of the obstacles women in the accounting profession face when trying to make their way into leadership positions.

IMA’s Jeff Thomson on the Role and Skills of Management Accountants

May 8, 2013

Institute of Management Accountants president and CEO Jeffrey Thomson discusses why accounting students should consider management accounting as a career, and the IMA's partnership with John Wiley & Sons.

Breaking out of Molds to Get Ahead

May 6, 2013

ConvergenceCoaching partner Jennifer Wilson talks with Accounting Today senior editor Danielle Lee about how female accountants can position themselves better for a promotion at their firms.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Tech Initiatives -- 2013

May 5, 2013

The AICPA's annual list of IT priorities for accounting firms.

Tax Stats: May 2013

April 30, 2013

Our monthly collection of statistics from the world of tax.

10 Biggest Estate Planning Mistakes

April 29, 2013

Help your clients avoid these common pitfalls.

Common E-mail Security Mistakes

April 23, 2013

These five bad habits can make your confidential information -- and that of your clients -- easy to steal.

The Art of the Tax Cartoon

April 9, 2013

A selection of tax cartoons from Philly tax firm Drucker & Scaccetti's 'Finding Humor in Taxes' exhibit.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement