President Barack Obama called for tax reform as a way to temper drastic automatic budget cuts during his State of the Union address.

“The American people deserve a Tax Code that helps small businesses spend less time filling out complicated forms, and more time expanding and hiring, a Tax Code that ensures billionaires with high-powered accountants can’t work the system and pay a lower rate than their hardworking secretaries, a Tax Code that lowers incentives to move jobs overseas, and lowers tax rates for businesses and manufacturers that are creating jobs right here in the United States of America,” he said. “That’s what tax reform can deliver. That’s what we can do together.”
Obama pointed out that both parties had already worked together to reduce the budget deficit by more than $2.5 trillion over 10 years, more than halfway toward the goal of reducing the deficit by the $4 trillion that economists say is needed to stabilize the nation’s finances. However, the looming automatic budget cuts agreed to in 2011 could harm the economic recovery, he argued.
“In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn’t agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars’ worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year,” he said in his speech to a joint session of Congress Tuesday night. “These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They’d devastate priorities like education, and energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That’s why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as the sequester, are a really bad idea.”
Obama noted that some lawmakers in Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training, Medicare and Social Security benefits.
“That idea is even worse,” he said. “Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms. Otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations. But we can’t ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and the most powerful. We won’t grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers and more cops and more firefighters.
“Most Americans—Democrats, Republicans, and independents—understand that we can’t just cut our way to prosperity,” Obama added. “They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that’s the approach I offer tonight.”
Obama said that he was prepared to enact some reforms in Medicare that would achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan deficit reduction commission chaired by former Senator Alan Simpson and former White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles, known as Simpson-Bowles.
Obama pointed out that the Affordable Care Act is already helping to slow the growth of health care costs, and he proposed further reforms to reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors.
“We’ll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn’t be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital; they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive,” he said.”And I am open to additional reforms from both parties, so long as they don’t violate the guarantee of a secure retirement. Our government shouldn’t make promises we cannot keep, but we must keep the promises we’ve already made.”
To hit the rest of the deficit reduction target, Obama said lawmakers should do what leaders in both parties have already suggested, and save hundreds of billions of dollars by getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and the well-connected.
“After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks?” he asked. “How is that fair? Why is it that deficit reduction is a big emergency justifying making cuts in Social Security benefits but not closing some loopholes? How does that promote growth? Now is our best chance for bipartisan, comprehensive tax reform that encourages job creation and helps bring down the deficit. We can get this done.”
Obama acknowledged that tax reform and entitlement reform would not be easy. “The politics will be hard for both sides,” he said. “None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. So let’s set party interests aside and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future. And let’s do it without the brinksmanship that stresses consumers and scares off investors. The greatest nation on Earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. We can't do it.”
Obama offered a number of ways to create more jobs in the U.S. and expand the economy. He called on Congress to pass the rest of the American Jobs Act that he proposed a year and a half ago, saying it would create more than 1 million new jobs.
To create more manufacturing jobs, he asked Congress to create more “manufacturing innovation institute” modeled after one created last year in Youngstown, Ohio.
“A once-shuttered warehouse is now a state-of-the art lab where new workers are mastering the 3D printing that has the potential to revolutionize the way we make almost everything,” he said. “There’s no reason this can’t happen in other towns. So tonight, I’m announcing the launch of three more of these manufacturing hubs, where businesses will partner with the Department of Defense and Energy to turn regions left behind by globalization into global centers of high-tech jobs. And I ask this Congress to help create a network of 15 of these hubs and guarantee that the next revolution in manufacturing is made right here in America. We can get that done.”
Obama also called on Congress to invest more in research, pointing out that every dollar that was invested to map the human genome returned $140 to the economy. “Today, our scientists are mapping the human brain to unlock the answers to Alzheimer’s,” he said. “They’re developing drugs to regenerate damaged organs; devising new material to make batteries 10 times more powerful. Now is not the time to gut these job-creating investments in science and innovation. Now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the height of the Space Race. We need to make those investments.”
Climate Change
In particular, he called for more investment in clean energy sources such as wind and solar energy to combat climate change. “For the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change,” he said. “Now, it’s true that no single event makes a trend. But the fact is the 12 hottest years on record have all come in the last 15. Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, floods—all are now more frequent and more intense. We can choose to believe that Superstorm Sandy, and the most severe drought in decades, and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were all just a freak coincidence. Or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science—and act before it’s too late.”












8 Comments
Accounting Today: Chris XXX--a successful Texas businessman turned "green-ie" environmentalists, has proposed a plan that just may be what Obama is looking for in his State of the Union address when he said "Those states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make that happen." Chris spent 30 years in the construction business. Having built offices for over 1,000 tenants, he has personally been associated with demolition of immeasurable volumes of gypsum board, studs, electrical, etc. This represents a shameful waste of our energy and non-renewable natural resources. Chris's plan is for each State to increase the construction & demolition (C&D waste) dumping fees. This simple but direct policy change will have direct measurable effects. 1st, Suddenly it becomes more profitable to "re-use" construction materials than to demolish them. Money flows into labor to de-construct ("creating jobs") rather than energy waste making new raw materials and transportation fuel costs. 2nd, There are new products available that make de-construction more affordable than demolition like a demountable drywall Green-Zip joint tape that avoid the need to demolish partitions. In addition these products often qualify for long standing federal income tax benefits as they change Section 1250 property to Section 1245. 3rd, It raises State Revenue, with the least negative political resistance. Our state governments thus far have avoided the grid-lock. Perhaps they can be fruitful with our resources. 2013.02.13: Obama also set a goal of cutting in half the energy wasted by homes and businesses over the next 20 years. "We'll work with the states to do it," he said. "Those states with the best ideas to create jobs and lower energy bills by constructing more efficient buildings will receive federal support to help make that happen." Frank XXX M.S. Architecture / Tax Law AIA, ASID, NCAR Bd. Certified
FrankLittle@TaxAdvantageDesign.com
Posted by: FrankLittle | February 14, 2013 10:03 AM
Report this Comment
Oh and it'll be great to watch my HSA get basically legislated out of existence. Can't have anyone taking responsibliity for their own heathcare now, can we?
Posted by: Jmayocpa | February 13, 2013 3:03 PM
Report this Comment
Wow, tax simplification? BWAHAHAHAHA! Come on! I'm on my 21st tax season and the ONLY rule is that EVERY year it gets HARDER, MORE EXPENSIVE, more geared towards the multinationals, and MORE COMPILCATED. Don't blow smoke up my chimney Obiwan. You have got to be kidding me. Simplification. Yeah. That's rich. Let's see how simple it is next year as we're policing Obamacare for the IRS. Has anybody noticed the cost of healthcare "slowing"...what even does that mean? It's going up exponentially. What a joke.
Posted by: Jmayocpa | February 13, 2013 3:00 PM
Report this Comment
I see both sides of the argument. Reagan made the Chicago welfare queen famous by telling a completely fabricated story about a woman on welfare who drove around in a Cadillac by defrauding the system.
I believe that a majority of those receiving public assistance would prefer to be able to support themselves. However, not everyone is honest. I support drug testing, work & job training for those on assistance. However, there is the other side of multi-national corporations hiring for a temporary position and several years later that temporary position has not been reclassified to permanent full time.
Defense is out of control. The special interest groups that would be wiped out if even 10% of defense spending were cut would be amazing. No more free rounds of golf, "charity auctions", and .....
Yes everyone is or has the right to hire an accountant (CPA) who is also a tax attorney, but I can't afford that. I take the deductions I am entitled to. Most of those deductions are in the form of AGI or happen at the time I am paid. I contribute pre-tax earnings to a HSA as well as to a qualifying retirement savings account. The amount of money that Google has in off shore (legal) accounts that it will not bring back into the USA is staggering. There should be tax reform so that any taxes paid to a foreign government would not be counted as income when brought back into the US. Increase domestic investment and production.
Posted by: sar84067 | February 13, 2013 2:30 PM
Report this Comment
"In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn't agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars' worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year," and you signed it Mr. President.
If it takes about a trillion dollars' worth of Federal Deficit spending to maintain our economy it really isn't a very healthy economy, is it Mr. President?
Let's take the hit, reduce Federal spending, reallocate Federal Department Budgets as necessary and see if it is really that bad a year from now.
By the way, those "high powered accountants" are available to everybody, not just the super wealthy. I'll bet you have a CPA or Tax Attorney prepare your Tax Returns, Mr. President!
Posted by: Raymond S | February 13, 2013 1:46 PM
Report this Comment
To cherylrein: Does you client hire High School kids because they need the work to help support their parents and siblings, of because it's a source of cheap, and easy to manipulate, labor.
For the breadwinners, they should be paid enough for honest labor in order not to need food stamps and Medicaid in order to survive for themselves and family. Why should the taxpaying public have to support private business? Seems private business wants a handout/entitlement, which they complain about when others need it.
Can't have it both ways.
Posted by: tego@verizon.net | February 13, 2013 1:18 PM
Report this Comment
The President, as usual, is way off base. We are already overburdened with taxes and the middle class will always pay the freight. The rich have all the resources (and Congress in their pockets) and the poor don't contribute anyway. And I don't really think we can control the climate of the earth, do you? We had to lay off one whole person just to pay one tax this year - the Illinois Unemployment Tax (almost 10%!). There goes another family without work.......I have a client who will close when the minimum wage goes up as well (she employes high school kids). Illinois wants to raise it to $10! We in business tighten our belts with real cuts and the government, of course, has a different definition of a cut. As you all know, to them a "cut" means no increase. Everything they are doing is CUTTING JOBS! We have nothing left to cut in our business, so next year any capital expenditures will have to go. We'll just try to patch up the old vans and try to keep them running.
Posted by: cherylrein | February 13, 2013 12:37 PM
Report this Comment
To develop the economy with these measures are not enough because time is lost for the American manufacturers. International companies have already bought the politicians, who will defend their interests in Congress. Social funds are looted. Employees will pay higher taxes so that the amnestied illegal immigrants could receive benefits. The money, collected during the amnesty of undocumented aliens, administration will be able to spend partially of paying the interest on the foreign debt ...
Posted by: nadezdamindyuk | February 13, 2013 8:18 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.