Free Site Registration


PCAOB Drops Firm for Failing to File Annual Report

Print
Email
Reprints
New York (February 17, 2012)

By Michael Cohn, Accounting Today

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board has revoked the registration for a firm for failing to file an annual report or pay its annual fee for 2011 and ordered the firm to pay a $5,000 penalty.

The PCAOB said that Paul Gaynes of the firm Gaynes & Stein in Plainview, N.Y., had failed to file annual reports for 2010 and 2011, in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failed to pay his annual fee for 2011. He also failed to respond to an Order Instituting Disciplinary Proceedings from the PCAOB by the Sept. 16, 2011 deadline. The PCAOB chief hearing officer issued an initial decision sanctioning Gaynes’ registration with the PCAOB in November and the PCAOB issued a notice of finality of the initial decision in early January. The decision was posted on the PCAOB Web site Friday.

Contacted at his firm, Gaynes indicated he had turned over his SEC audit work to other auditors until the matter is resolved.

Advertisement

“By the time we got it [the order], we didn’t want to fight with them,” he said. “I turned over the SEC [work] to other people, and I recommended [clients] to other people. Maybe we’ll get it straightened out in a year or two.”

In December 2010, the PCAOB said that Gaynes had sent its registration staff an email saying that his firm “need[ed] real guidance on filing the annual report," and said he would telephone the PCAOB registration staff to obtain guidance. However, despite failing to file his annual report for 2010, he had issued audit reports on the financial statements of four broker-dealers in February 2011 and failed to pay the annual registration fee by July.

The PCAOB has recently been given expanded authority to inspect auditors of broker-dealers under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.

2 Comments

@Linor34b So $5,000 is a "big penalty" now? Seems comically low to me - a minor slap on the wrist for a firm who blatantly disregarded filing requirements.

Deficient or not, as an investor I certainly wouldn't want to trust the audit work of a firm who can't seem to get their operations in order enough to meet regulatory requirements.

Posted by: natecannon | February 21, 2012 10:00 AM

Report this Comment


So the predictions of some that SOX is just another way for the governing bodies to extract more money has finally come to pass. My question is, was the firm deficient in their audited reports? If not, then why the big penalty? It seems like we are being fleeced right and left.

Posted by: Linor34b | February 21, 2012 9:33 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's New at Grant Thornton

May 14, 2012

CEO Stephen Chipman talks about his firm's new brand focus on growth, and its recent M&A activity.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Payroll Mistakes Companies Make

May 14, 2012

Keeping your clients from running afoul of IRS rules around payroll taxes will help them avoid stiff penalties.

10 Years of the Top 100 Firms

May 6, 2012

Tracking trends at the biggest firms in the U.S.

Best Accounting Firm Taglines

April 27, 2012

Our favorite slogans from around the profession.

Favorite Busy Season Activities

April 10, 2012

LinkedIn Accounting members share the best methods to bust stress and boost morale.

The Best Places to Be an Accountant 2012

March 27, 2012

From our 2012 Regional Leaders list, we rank the best parts of the country to operate an accounting firm.

More Wacky Tax Deductions

March 26, 2012

LinkedIn members point out some weird tax deductions their clients have suggested.

7 Tax-Free Benefits for Employees

April 15, 2012

Employee rewards Uncle Sam can't touch.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement