Free Site Registration


Protecting Tax Clients from the Fiscal Cliff

Print
Email
Reprints
November 16, 2012

While tax experts are divided on the immediate future of tax rates as we approach the fiscal cliff (the combination of scheduled tax rate increases and spending cuts by the government), the consensus is that rates will indeed rise precipitously.

If nothing is done legislatively before the end of the year, capital gains rates will increase from 15 to 20 percent, and dividends will be taxed at up to 39.6 percent instead of 15 percent. And the $5.12 million ($10.24 million for couples) that can currently be transferred free of gift or estate tax will drop to $1 million, along with a rise in the top estate tax rate to 55 percent.

With a divided Congress, compromise will be difficult, according to Larry Peck, a New York-based tax specialist and estate planner. He sees an advantage for Democrats to go over the fiscal cliff.

“Once the Bush tax cuts have expired, the Democrats would be in a position to draft their own plan to reduce taxes for the middle class and dare the Republicans to refuse to pass it,” he observed.

A number of his clients plan to take advantage of the current more favorable tax scheme before it disappears at the end of the year, Peck indicated. While clients with substantial wealth are concerned about diminishing their liquid assets and cash flow by making large gifts, with proper planning the high exemption benefit can be preserved while satisfying liquid net worth and cash flow concerns.

“This can be done through spousal lifetime access trusts —SLATs—a trust that permits each spouse to create a trust from which the other spouse can receive distributions, and at the same time remove the trust assets from both of their taxable estates,” he said. “Typically, these trusts are set up to run for multiple generations and will shelter the trust assets from transfer taxes at each generation for as long as the trusts are permitted to last under state law.”

Many others will consider selling their business, real estate or stocks before year-end to capitalize on the lower capital gains tax rate, Peck predicted. “Investors with dividend-paying stocks may consider selling them in favor of growth stocks because of the potential tax increase on dividends from 15 percent to 39.6 percent,” he said. “And employees who have the option of receiving their bonuses in 2012 may want to take advantage of that.”

Other items set to expire at year’s end include the payroll tax holiday of 2 percent, which approximated $2,000 a year for an individual making $100,000, noted Jim Daniels, managing director at UHY Advisors NY. “The loss of the payroll tax holiday would affect all individuals by an increase in payroll deductions. There is a good possibility this could be modified or extended given the fragile economy,” he said.

“Given the desire not to derail the economy, there should be some action,” Daniels added. “I believe a compromise will be reached because, at this point, both parties have nothing to gain by seeing the economy derailed again given the recent slight upturn.”

On the corporate side, there has been talk about lowering the federal rate to 25 percent, noted Chuck Sockett, managing director at UHY Advisors. “Such a move would put the federal tax on par with most of the rates in the Westernized world and may be the catalyst needed for companies to invest in the U.S. and not overseas,” he said.

And future estate tax rates are also unknown, observed Joe Falanga, a managing director at UHY Advisors, who believes that the Obama administration’s proposed legislative initiatives to close what it perceives as estate and gift tax loopholes will all be up for negotiation.

The Obama administration has consistently supported a $3,500,000 exemption and 45 percent tax rate, he noted. “Any new exemption and tax rate will have to be negotiated and will likely be overshadowed by the looming fight over income tax rates.”

3 Comments

I do not see going over the cliff as an advantege to the democrats.

On the contrary, most replublicansin congress, have signed the Grover Norquist "Taxpayer Protection Pledge", a written promise by legislators and candidates for office that commits them to oppose tax increases.

By inaction, they can let let the "bush Tax Cuts" expire, any agreement they reach later they would later claim that it was a "reduction" in taxes taxes and not "violate their prescious pledge."

This type of smoke and mirrors would be straight out of the 2000-2006 republican congress playbook that gave us "the temporary Bush Tax Cuts"

Also the 2011 congress "Budget Control Act," a bill mandating the formation of a "super committee" to develop a plan to trim $1.2 trillion off the national debt that calls for automatic deductions in spending and increases in taxes so draconian that Congress would not allow that to happen. And? You guessed it. No consensus was reached between Congress and the White House and now the ticking time bomb that is the fiscal cliff is staring all of us in the face

Posted by: jeromanix | November 16, 2012 12:38 PM

Report this Comment


So why are the Republicans stonewalling and drawing lines in the sand again? What the party indicates it does not want to happen will but will unfortunately also add millions of middle income taxpayers as all will be affected by the ATM.

Does no one analyze the affects. Each party appears to indicate "that is not true" in supposed negotiations to any proposal But analysis of the tax laws and using math examples shows the bottom line affect.

Posted by: JD9539 | November 16, 2012 9:08 AM

Report this Comment


"an advantage for Democrats to go over the fiscal cliff"

This would explain why the Democrats are only talking compromise while empowering those (Pelosi comes to mind) who has shown no inclination to give in on anything.

Posted by: nraacct | November 16, 2012 7:33 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Jason Marx on the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Accountants

June 17, 2013

CCH Small Firm Services president Jason Marx talks about the challenges confronting small accounting firms, including regulatory and tax compliance, technology adoption, and do-it-yourself software.

Jennifer Warawa on the 'On-Demand' Accountant

June 14, 2013

Jennifer Warawa, VP of partner programs and channel sales at Sage, discusses how accountants need to communicate more frequently with clients so they become more of an "on-demand" resource.

George Farrah on the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Accountants

June 14, 2013

Bloomberg BNA executive editor of tax and accounting George Farrah discusses how accountants today are dealing with the economy, technology, globalization and practice management.

Amit Jain on Three Key Trends in Accounting

June 13, 2013

Amit Jain of ADP Small Business Services discusses how the accounting firm of tomorrow will be different from accounting firms today.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

What’s in the Lease Accounting Exposure Draft?

June 18, 2013

A quick guide to FASB’s proposed standards from Bloomberg BNA.

20 Trends to Watch

June 16, 2013

New areas of change that accountants should be on the lookout for.

Protecting Clients from Tax-Related Identity Theft

May 31, 2013

Tax-related identity theft is a continuing problem, and a trustworthy tax preparer is an important part of the solution.

10 Simple Revenue Boosters to Start Now

May 28, 2013

Are your prospects choosing another accounting firm just because of price? There are ways to boost your image to earn a premium fee and leave low-price competitors behind.

Tax Season by the Numbers

May 22, 2013

The IRS recently released statistics covering the year to May 10, 2013.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement