State budget deficits are prompting governors to slash spending, but also shift the tax burden away from corporations.
The most notorious case that has been making headlines in recent weeks has been in Wisconsin, where recently elected Governor Scott Walker faced thousands of angry protestors in the state capital outraged by his plan to end the right to collective bargaining over benefits for most state employee unions while cutting wages and benefits. Soon after he arrived in office, the Republican governor signed a series of tax cut bills granting tax breaks to businesses that would add about $117 million to the budget deficit.
The state is projecting a $3.7 billion budget shortfall, and Walker and the Republican-dominated state legislature managed to pass their controversial budget repair bill even after Democrats in the state Senate fled to neighboring states to try to prevent a quorum and a vote on the bill. Meanwhile, the state is reducing the ability of local school districts to be able to pay for cuts in state aid by raising property taxes and other local taxes.
Advertisement
In Michigan, another newly elected governor, Rick Snyder, has managed to pass legislation that would give “emergency managers” the ability to fire a city government in a fiscal emergency. Snyder has also proposed to end the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit and $600 per child tax deduction, while raising taxes on retiree pensions. Meanwhile, Snyder has proposed a $1.7 billion tax cut for businesses.
In Florida, Governor Rick Scott has also proposed deep corporate and property tax cuts despite a projected $3.6 billion revenue shortfall. Under one bill already approved by the Florida House, the business tax cuts would be paid for by cuts in unemployment benefits.
With so many states facing yawning budget deficits, it seems like a curious time to be cutting corporate taxes, especially when it means slashing school budgets and jobs. Yet in Washington too, the push for tax reform continues unabated even after last December’s deal to extend tax cuts for businesses and individuals for another two years. Unfortunately, while cutting taxes is generally a good way to win votes, it’s not so easy to slash spending without hurting the voters.







3 Comments
Most people avoid any contact with IRS. Why would they want those inefficient clerks to prepare their taxes? You are so right, it IS like putting the fox into the hen house.
IF IRS were to prepare taxes, 99% would be incorrect, as they do not have a clue how a person will file - are they someone else's dependent? Does the child live WITH the taxpayer? The 1099R, does the taxpayer qualify for 10 year averaging? Far too many variables for IRS to deal with.
THEN if they prepare the taxes, the taxpayer takes it to a professional tax preparer to check for errors, then does it have to be amended? This is opening up a can of worms that can only harm the taxpayer.
BAD IDEA!!!!
Posted by: winkiebbs | March 17, 2011 11:59 AM
Report this Comment
Conventional Republican wisdom says cutting corporate taxes raises income due to increased investment and hiring. Conventional Democratic wisdom says cutting taxes decreases income. Can someone point to studies that show which is indeed the case?
Posted by: URL98902 | March 17, 2011 11:35 AM
Report this Comment
Nice liberal reporting (again). Why don't you just join the Obama administration.
Posted by: mgrupp123 | March 16, 2011 9:42 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.