(Bloomberg) -- House Republican leaders canceled a planned vote on Thursday night on Speaker John Boehner's plan to allow higher tax rates for annual income above $1 million, throwing already-stalled budget talks deeper into turmoil.
"The House did not take up the tax measure today because it did not have sufficient support from our members to pass," Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said in a statement. He called on President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to come up with legislation to avoid more than $600 billion of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to start in January.
Standard & Poor's 500 Index futures dropped 1.5 percent amid mounting concern that Congress will be unable to resolve the budget standoff with just 11 days left before the deadline.
"The president's main priority is to ensure that taxes don't go up on 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses in just a few short days," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in an e-mailed statement. "We are hopeful that we will be able to find a bipartisan solution quickly."
Boehner said he will call Obama, said Rep. Steven LaTourette of Ohio. A House leadership announcement said the chamber will hold no more votes until after the Christmas holiday and will return "when needed."
"The odds go up that we go over the fiscal cliff," said Rep. Rob Bishop of Utah, a Republican.
Plan B
The failure of what Boehner called Plan B made it less clear what budget legislation the House or Congress could pass. The White House had said it would veto the tax bill and Reid had said it was dead on arrival in the Senate.
Many Republicans, including Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina and Tim Huelskamp of Kansas, were wary of voting for a bill that allowed tax rates to go up for anyone.
Boehner's inability to pass his tax alternative is "certainly a victory for conservative principles," Huelskamp said. Boehner removed the Kansas lawmaker from the House Budget Committee after he opposed the speaker on prior spending and budget issues.
The vote's cancellation "didn't solve the problem but it avoids creating bigger problems -- Republicans caving on core principles," Huelskamp told reporters.
Republicans spent the day trying to muster support for their legislation, using votes on unrelated bills to bring members to the floor and asking Republican senators to call House members.
House Recess
Just after 7 p.m. in Washington, instead of starting debate on the bill, leaders began a recess. Boehner conferred with his leadership, then called a 7:45 p.m. meeting.
That meeting lasted fewer than 15 minutes as Boehner told his colleagues he didn't have enough votes to bring the bill to the floor. Republicans have 241 members of the 435-member House.
Boehner started the meeting with a prayer for serenity and then read to the conference his statement that a few moments later was released to the press, according to a person who was in the room and sought anonymity to discuss the private meeting.
"It was just too big a hill to climb," said Texas Republican Joe Barton.
Democrats saw the failed attempt as proof that Boehner can't control his own members.
Representative Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, said on Bloomberg Television on Thursday night that Boehner should have a vote on an Obama-backed proposal that would allow tax rates to rise for households earning $250,000 or more, even if it undermines his support among Republican.
The Risk
"That's the risk he takes," Van Hollen said. "I would hope he would put the country before Republican caucus politics."
Fewer than two weeks remain to avert the so-called fiscal cliff, set to start in January. The Congressional Budget Office has said that a failure to avert those changes would probably lead to a recession in the first half of 2013.
If Congress doesn't act, tax rates for income at all levels would rise next month, along with taxes on estates, capital gains and dividends.
Earlier on Thursday evening, Republicans barely got enough votes to pass a spending-cut measure they brought up in a bid to gain support for Boehner's bill among lawmakers wary of increasing tax rates without also reducing federal program costs.
That bill passed 215-209 with one member voting present. It would eliminate most of the automatic cuts scheduled for 2013 and replace them with $314.5 billion worth of other cuts to food stamps, federal workers' benefits and other programs.
Anti-Tax Stance
Republicans have held a firm anti-tax stance for 22 years.
Boehner's measure would permanently extend tax cuts for almost everyone, and Republicans sold it to their members as the best deal they could hope for with Obama in office. They had scheduled the vote over the objections of anti-tax groups such as the Club for Growth and the Heritage Foundation.
Under Boehner's bill, on incomes above $1 million, the tax rate on ordinary income would go to 39.6 percent from 35 percent, and the top rate on capital gains and dividends would go to 23.8 percent from 15 percent, including a 3.8 percent tax from the 2010 health care law that starts in January.
Compared with continuing current policies, the bill would probably raise between $300 billion and $400 billion, based on official estimates of other proposals.
The bill would extend current estate tax policy, which has a $5.12 million per-person exemption indexed for inflation and a 35 percent top rate. It would permanently prevent the expansion of the Alternative Minimum Tax.
Some lawmakers expressed uncertainty about the path ahead even before Boehner's decision. "Don't make me lie to you," said Representative Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat first elected to Congress in 1970. "I have no idea what the hell is happening."
--With assistance from Kathleen Hunter, Derek Wallbank, Margaret Talev, Peter Cook and James Rowley in Washington. Editors: Laurie Asseo, Jodi Schneider











6 Comments
And in the latter part of the Reagan years, when he realized his earlier mistake, taxes went up.
Posted by: tego@verizon.net | December 22, 2012 7:17 PM
Report this Comment
I realize that sounds bites can be fun, and sometimes they might even be accurate, but Mr./Ms. SullivanAcctg really needs to take a closer look at the Reagan years. When those rates came down (and boy, did I benefit from that!), the deficits soared. Arthur Laffer's curve is a joke, yet many still believe his brand of snake oil. Mr. Stockman, who was fired for telling the truth about all those benefits that come from lower tax rates, called trickle down economics "voo doo" economics.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, this time the GOP is not in charge, although some think they are, including those making JB look like a fool a couple of days ago. The only reason they seemingly have had a larger club to bring to the party is that the President has always sought compromise. This time he says no dice. Last time I checked, he actually won the election and the House turned a bit more blue than before. Looks to me like it may all turn blue again if the GOP doesn't wake up and make a deal.
Around a decade or longer ago, the AICPA decided to fight the SEC chief, including sending out a letter to all members telling us to call or send a letter to our senator or representative requesting they call off the SEC, we ended up with SOX, the PCAOB, and a much reduced size of the AICPA sandbox. That could happen to the GOP as well... And that would be a shame.
Posted by: topbeancounter | December 22, 2012 4:37 PM
Report this Comment
Given the number of "Tea Partiers (sic)" elected by Tea Party members, who will be waking up shortly to find there is "no tea", just chemically flavored water, Bonehead should be coming up with Plan D, E, F, G, .............................., Z, AA, BB,..................
Posted by: tego@verizon.net | December 22, 2012 4:22 PM
Report this Comment
Plan C is "Crass Capitalism Collapses"
Which, of course, is the result of the CEO and Investor led credo of "Greed is God", as it was first explained to us by the Wonderboys of Wall Street.
Lest the knickers of the Accountants get into a twist, they signed on.
The hilarious result is the Comedy of Congress doing its avoidance dancing, to out of tune Conservative Quartets like Boehner,The Mitch, Ryan, and whatever local economist fossil that can stand in.
Better than Soaps on TV. Yeah!
Posted by: nostromo49 | December 21, 2012 10:39 PM
Report this Comment
Perhaps more business people should sell out. If you can't make it with 39% maximum tax and 3.25% prime rate, you shouldn't be in business.
Posted by: LaLafayette | December 21, 2012 11:22 AM
Report this Comment
We are in the worst stagnant economy for the last 70 years with the policies of the current administration making the situation worse. Raising taxes on ANYONE will push this economy over the edge into recession and worse. If the government needs more dollars they would have that result by lowering rates and reducing burdensome regulations and paperwork requirements on business. EVERY TIME rates have been lowered (and that is a low number of times) revenues in dollars have gone up, not down. Let's face it, if you remove the fiscal pain you free up activity. If there is more activity there is more PROFIT which means more taxes, not less. I am incredibly pleased to see some sensible action in the House for a change. Raising tax rates is not a strategy that improves anything. And a note to Boehner, the constitution gives the responsibility for taxes and spending to the House, if Harry Reid and Obama don't like what the House comes up with (and without compromise), then wait till they realize that they have no power to change it. As a side note, if the government shuts down, there is a real possibility that the majority of the taxpayers (an increasingly smaller number of people) might enjoy that so much that it might be hard to get it back up and running again with massive protests!!
Posted by: SullivanAcctg | December 21, 2012 9:12 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.