Free Site Registration


U.S. and Denmark Agree on Bilateral FATCA Pact

Print
Email
Reprints
Washington, D.C. (November 21, 2012)

By Michael Cohn

The U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service said Wednesday that the governments of the U.S. and Denmark have reached a bilateral agreement to implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act to improve international tax compliance.

FATCA, which was included as part of the HIRE Act of 2010, requires foreign financial institutions, including hedge funds, to disclose the assets of U.S. taxpayers to the IRS. To help encourage foreign banks to implement the controversial provisions of the law, the U.S. has been negotiating agreements with foreign governments to provide information on their citizens to their tax authorities as well. So far, the U.S. has negotiated model agreements with five other countries—the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Spain—and signed a deal with the United Kingdom. Denmark is now the latest country to reach an accord on FATCA with the U.S.

Earlier this month, the Treasury Department said that it is engaging in talks with more than 50 countries and jurisdictions across the globe on FATCA compliance, including Denmark (see U.S. in Talks with 50+ Nations on FATCA Enforcement). Last Wednesday, the Treasury Department published a second model intergovernmental agreement, known as Model 2, for implementing FATCA, following the publication of the original model agreement with the five previously announced countries.

“As expected, the Model II IGA will require Foreign financial institutions to enter into agreements with, and report directly to, the IRS,” said Denise Hintzke, leader of Deloitte Tax LLP’s Global Foreign Account Tax Compliance Initiative, in a statement. “Model II is essentially a combination of Swiss/Japanese agreements issued earlier this year. The definitions are consistent with Model I, including the definition of an FFI. One major difference between Models I & II is that Model I, did not require FFIs to enter into an agreement with US government. Rather, FFIs would be governed by local law and the required reporting would be done through their own government. However, Model II states that FFIs must register with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service by Jan. 1, 2014, and comply with the terms of the FFI agreement – including due diligence, withholding and reporting requirements.

“In addition, the reporting in Model II requires FFIs to contact U.S. citizens with pre-existing accounts and obtain a consent to report and inform the Account Holder in writing that, if the U.S. TIN and consent are not given, (1) aggregate information about the account shall be reported to the IRS, (2) information about the account may give rise to a group request by the IRS for specific information about the account, (3) in such case, the account information shall be transmitted to the local tax administration, and (4) the local tax administration may exchange this information with the IRS in accordance,” Hintze noted. “If accountholder consent is not given, the FFI is required to report that consent was refused to the IRS. In the case of new accounts, consent to report must be given, or the account cannot be opened.”

1 Comment

Well, this is a signature between Treasury Technocrats, and so still requires Denmark legislative approval, does it not? We know our Treasury is designating these as Executive Agreements so as to by pass the 'Advise and Consent' Senate process a normal Tax Treaty would require. Clever little devils these ideological Fatcanatics, working their will and creating ever more complexity with a FATCA draft regulations of 388 pages not done, then embarking on Treaties with 50 nations to force this fiasco down their throats.

What is happening with that little false morsel of reciprocity they are dangling as an enticement. Is Congress really going to just passively sit around and allow a domestic FATCA (DATCA) to be pushed onto their countries shores by Treasury without anything to say? Was this the intention of FATCA when first passed into law?

Will anyone but the specialty blogs and industry news organizations wake up to what is happening? Probably not, until a global GATCA is cemented in place, and make no mistake about it, that is the OECD goal that is cheering FATCA on!

Posted by: Just Me | November 26, 2012 12:39 PM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Subscribe to the Tax Pro Today newsletter
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Art of the Tax Cartoon

April 9, 2013

A selection of tax cartoons from Philly tax firm Drucker & Scaccetti's 'Finding Humor in Taxes' exhibit

Tax Quiz: Bonus Round

April 5, 2013

One last chance to test your tax knowledge with these final questions from the experts at the National Association of Tax Professionals.

Tax Quiz: Round One

March 11, 2013

Test your tax knowledge with these questions from the experts at the National Association of Tax Professionals.

Strangest Tax Laws

March 5, 2013

State lawmakers can certainly think of some strange tax laws. The Tax & Accounting business of Thomson Reuters recently produced its annual list of "quirky" sales and use tax laws from the past year.

Most Ridiculous Tax Deductions

February 20, 2013

The Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants recently surveyed its CPA members about the most creative tax deductions proposed by their clients. Here are some of the most memorable responses from the MNCPA's annual list of strange and unacceptable tax deductions for 2012.

Tax Stats: February 2013

February 9, 2013

Our monthly collection of statistics from the world of tax, from Beyond415

Advertisement
Advertisement