Free Site Registration


U.S. Losing Ground from Higher Corporate Tax Rate

Print
Email
Reprints
Washington, D.C. (March 20, 2013)

By Michael Cohn

The U.S. economy will be between 1.5 and 2.6 percent smaller over the long-term because other nations’ corporate tax rates are considerably more competitive, according to a new study by Ernst & Young and the RATE Coalition, a group lobbying for lower corporate tax rates.

The study measured the effect of changes in corporate income tax systems, including lower corporate income tax rates in other countries, on the U.S. economy. The authors of the study argue that the U.S. increasing inability to compete will result in real wages being 1.0 to 1.2 percent less than they otherwise would have been. In today’s $15.7 trillion economy, the long-term impact on the U.S. economy would be equal to a reduction in U.S. gross domestic product of about $235 billion to $345 billion each year, according to the report. The average statutory foreign corporate tax rate of the 19 countries analyzed in the report will have fallen nearly 35 percent between 1988 and 2015, when all currently scheduled changes will be fully in effect.

The study estimated that U.S. GDP would be between 1.2 percent and 2.0 percent smaller in 2013 because of the high U.S. corporate tax rate relative to the reductions in corporate tax rates enacted abroad beginning in 1988. In the long run, the U.S. economy, as measured by GDP, is estimated to be smaller by between 1.5 percent and 2.6 percent if the current differences in corporate tax rates remain.

“In 1986 President Reagan and congressional leaders passed a tax reform package that drastically reduced America’s corporate tax rate and broadened the tax base, clearing the way for over a decade of strong economic growth,” said James P. Pinkerton, co-chair of the RATE Coalition and a former White House domestic policy adviser to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. “The new data in today’s report makes clear that the United States needs to replicate that success or risk being outcompeted by our foreign rivals. Our corporate tax rate has remained at a standstill while our competitors have lowered theirs by 35 percent. We can’t afford to wait any longer.”

The statutory corporate income tax rate is as high as 35 percent, but many corporations lower their effective tax rates by using tax strategies such as tax deferral, transfer pricing and shifting profits to foreign subsidiaries. Congress has been promising action on tax reform this year, but withpartisan divisions among lawmakers, the prospects for a comprehensive tax reform deal remain as uncertain as ever.

The RATE Coalition represents 30 multinational companies and organizations advocating for cororate tax reform. Its members include: AT&T, Altria Client Services, the Association of American Railroads, Boeing, Brown Forman, Capital One, Cox Enterprises, CVS Caremark, FedEx, Ford, GAP Inc., General Dynamics, Home Depot, Intel, Kimberly-Clark, Liberty Media, Lockheed Martin, Macy's, the National Retail Federation, Nike, Northrup Grumman, Raytheon, Reynolds American, Southern Company Time Warner Cable, T-Mobile, UPS, Verizon, Viacom and Walt Disney.

“America has long been the world leader in terms of innovation and work ethic, but we can no longer rely on those virtues alone as other countries outpace us when it comes to corporate competitiveness,” said Elaine Kamarck, co-chair of the RATE Coalition and a former White House adviser to President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore. “In only a few years, our competitors’ average corporate tax rate will be 24 percent lower than ours and the United States economy will be up to 2.2 percent smaller than it would be if America had a competitive corporate tax rate. We need to reform our tax code by putting all tax expenditures on the table and committing ourselves to achieving a competitive corporate tax rate. That’s what worked in 1986 and that is what will work today.”

1 Comment

Not only does the US pay a high price in terms of stifled economic growth because of having the highest corporate tax rate, but the same is true because of of our unique citizenship-based tax policies applied to our citizens. All other industrialized countries practice residence-based taxation. They tax those who live within their borders burt do not tax their citizens who live and work outside of their home country.

The US taxes all who live within our borders, but also taxes our citizens who live and work abroad as if they never left home, where they have already been taxed once on their world-wide income by those countries. Yes, there are provisions for foreign tax credits to offset the double US tax obligation and a partial exclusion from US tax on a limited amount of foreign income taxes, but because foreign tax laws are so different and the rules and additional tax forms that are so complex that very expensive specialized professional assistance is necessary, even if the US citizen abroad ends up with a zero US tax obligation. Failure to submit a totally letter-perfect FBAR Form TD-F 90-22.1 results in a mandatory minimum penalty of $10,000 even though the error has no effect on the person's US tax liability.

Yet nobody in Washington seems to be able to understand why, while most of our industrialized competitor nations are going gangbusters successfully caputuring foreign markets and have balanced trade or trade surpluses. They capture the China import market (the #2 import market in the world) while the US last year racked up a $740 billion world trade deficit ($315 billion was with China) which was 60% of the world's total trade deficits. It takes American feet on the ground to sell American exports, but it is our citizenship-based taxation, not China's currency policies, which have destroyed the 7.9 million jobs producing exports this trade deificit represents because of the tax supression of our citizens going abroad to sell them. Nationals of other countries go but Americans stay home and the whole nation reaps the negative consequences of our citizenship-based tax supression of our own export sales.

Posted by: RogerC | March 21, 2013 7:40 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Women in Accounting: Breaking the Mold

May 21, 2013

A continued conversation with Marcum’s Nanette Lee Miller and Janis Cowhey McDonagh about the obstacles women in the accounting profession face when trying to make their way into leadership positions.

IMA’s Jeff Thomson on the Role and Skills of Management Accountants

May 8, 2013

Institute of Management Accountants president and CEO Jeffrey Thomson discusses why accounting students should consider management accounting as a career, and the IMA's partnership with John Wiley & Sons.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Tech Initiatives -- 2013

May 5, 2013

The AICPA's annual list of IT priorities for accounting firms.

Tax Stats: May 2013

April 30, 2013

Our monthly collection of statistics from the world of tax.

10 Biggest Estate Planning Mistakes

April 29, 2013

Help your clients avoid these common pitfalls.

Common E-mail Security Mistakes

April 23, 2013

These five bad habits can make your confidential information -- and that of your clients -- easy to steal.

The Art of the Tax Cartoon

April 9, 2013

A selection of tax cartoons from Philly tax firm Drucker & Scaccetti's 'Finding Humor in Taxes' exhibit.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement