A new White House report from the President’s Council of Economic Advisers predicts that allowing tax rates for the middle class to rise and failing to patch the alternative minimum tax would have a negative impact on consumer spending and retailers alike.
The report, which was released Monday, forecasts that allowing the middle-class tax rates to rise and failing to patch the Alternative Minimum Tax could cut the growth of real consumer spending by 1.7 percentage points in 2013. “This sharp rise in middle-class taxes and the resulting decline in consumption could slow the growth of real GDP by 1.4 percentage points, which is consistent with recently published estimates from the Congressional Budget Office,” said the report.
Faced with these tax hikes, the report estimates that consumers could spend nearly $200 billion less than they otherwise would have in 2013 because of higher taxes. This reduction of $200 billion is approximately four times the total amount that 226 million shoppers spent on Black Friday weekend last year. The $200 billion reduction would probably be spread across all areas of consumer spending.
The report cites the example of a married couple with two children who have income between about $50,000 and $85,000, and estimates they would see a $2,200 tax increase. There would be a tax increase of $1,000 because the Child Tax Credit will fall from $1,000 to $500 per child, a tax increase of $890 because of merging the 10 percent tax bracket into the 15 percent tax bracket, and a tax increase of $310 because of the expiration of marriage penalty relief that provides a larger standard deduction for married couples.
President Obama and congressional Democrats have proposed to extend all the income tax cuts that benefit families who make less than $250,000 per year. The President has called on Congress to act now on extending all income tax cuts for 98 percent of American families and not to hold the middle-class and our economy hostage over a disagreement on tax cuts for households with incomes over $250,000 per year. The Senate has passed this bill and the President said he is ready to sign it.
“We should not hold the middle-class hostage while we debate tax cuts for the wealthy,” Obama said earlier this month. “We should at least do what we agree on, and that's to keep middle-class taxes low. And I’ll bring everyone in to sign it right away so we can give folks some certainty before the holiday season.”
Congressional Republicans have so far resisted allowing tax rates to rise for both middle-class and upper-income taxpayers, although Democrats have insisted on the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for taxpayers earning over $250,000 a year. Negotiations are underway among staff members of both parties in Congress to decide what to do about the rising tax rates and the automatic spending cuts for both domestic and defense programs in order to avert a “fiscal cliff” that threatens to plunge the economy into recession next year.
A retail industry trade group expressed concern about the report. “Today’s report underscores enormous challenges that consumers and retailers will face if the White House and Congress are unable to work together to address these critical issues,” said Retail Industry Leaders Association president Sandy Kennedy in a statement. “The White House and Congress must work together to address the fiscal cliff. If they fail to do so, the strong opening to this year’s holiday shopping season will soon be a distant memory as consumers prepare for a massive tax increase.”






5 Comments
ANY tax hike is wrong. From village governments through the Federal government they all spend and waste too much. What are they going to do with the additional revenues? Redistribute them of course. As long as we enable these irresponsible politicians by giving them more money the real problem (spending) will remain. Unfortunately we must go over the fiscal cliff in order for things to get better. They must get worse first. It's not bad enough yet. Hopefully Obama will hold fast on his position and not compromise and the Republicans don't cave in either. This will force us over the cliff and we can get started rebuilding but we must learn our hard lesson. We cannot continue to spend tomorrow's money today and leave our children with the bill. It's immoral. The lesson of The Little Red Hen has all been forgotten as it has become our way of life.
Posted by: hisexcellency | November 29, 2012 8:00 AM
Report this Comment
Thanks taxman65. What do you think of a federal consumption tax to increase revenue? Perhaps a bit more pay as you go rather than all at once in the tax hike scenario.
Posted by: Vanster | November 28, 2012 12:15 PM
Report this Comment
Really, you're saying that 2 taxpayers who pay 10k each is more that 98 taxpayers paying 3k each. Your accounting skills are inexcusable!!!
Posted by: taxman65 | November 28, 2012 11:35 AM
Report this Comment
This falls into the category of DUH! If you take money away from the consumer they will spend less! Who'd a thunk?!?
As to raising taxes on high income EARNERS (emphasis intended) it applies as well. However, Those who have the most spend the most! So if you take an additional 10,000 out of their pockets they spend 10,000 less! If you take 3,000 out of an individual earning a smaller amount they spend 3,000 less! The 10,000 out of the private sector makes a bigger impact than the 3,000.
For Obama to hold the 98% hostage in order to collect a pittance from high earners (based on the miniscule effect on the budget) is inexcusable.
Posted by: SullivanAcctg | November 27, 2012 10:30 AM
Report this Comment
This falls into the category of DUH! If you take money away from the consumer they will spend less! Who'd a thunk?!?
As to raising taxes on high income EARNERS (emphasis intended) it applies as well. However, Those who have the most spend the most! So if you take an additional 10,000 out of their pockets they spend 10,000 less! If you take 3,000 out of an individual earning a smaller amount they spend 3,000 less! The 10,000 out of the private sector makes a bigger impact than the 3,000.
For Obama to hold the 98% hostage in order to collect a pittance from high earners (based on the miniscule effect on the budget) is inexcusable.
Posted by: SullivanAcctg | November 27, 2012 10:30 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.