Free Site Registration


Deloitte Overlooked Bank’s Transactions with Iran

Print
Email
Reprints
New York (August 7, 2012)

By Michael Cohn

Deloitte allegedly provided a bank accused of doing business with the Iranian government with a “watered down” independent report that omitted any mention of the suspicious transactions.

Standard Chartered Bank is under investigation by the New York State Department of Financial Services, which accused the London-based bank of scheming with the Iranian government and hiding from regulators roughly 60,000 secret transactions, totaling at least $250 billion, while the bank reaped hundreds of millions of dollars in fees.

“SCB’s actions left the U.S. financial system vulnerable to terrorists, weapons dealers, drug kingpins and corrupt regimes, and deprived law enforcement investigators of crucial information used to track all manner of criminal activity,” said an order issued Monday by Benjamin M. Lawsky, superintendent of the department.

The document notes that Deloitte may have aided in covering up the transactions for Standard Chartered Bank. “SCB intentionally withheld material information from New York and federal regulators in its effort to service Iranian clients,” said the document. “SCB carefully planned its deception and was apparently aided by its consultant Deloitte & Touche, LLP, which intentionally omitted critical information in its ‘independent report’ to regulators. This ongoing misconduct was especially egregious because—during a key period between 2004 and 2007—SCB’s New York branch was subject to a formal supervisory action by the Department and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for other regulatory compliance failures involving the Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering policies and procedures, and OFAC regulations."

In 2004, New York regulators discovered other significant violations by SCB of Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering laws. The bank consented to a formal enforcement action and executed a written agreement with the department and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York requiring it to adopt sound practices and hire an independent consultant to conduct a retrospective review of transactions from July 2002 through October 2004 to identify any suspicious activity.

SCB vowed to regulators that it would comply with the written agreement, the department noted in its order, and to that end, SCB retained Deloitte & Touche to conduct the required independent review and report its findings to the regulators.

“In August and September 2005, D&T unlawfully gave SCB confidential historical transaction review reports that it had prepared for two other major foreign banking clients that were under investigation for OFAC [Office of Foreign Assets Control] violations and money laundering activities,” said the order. “These reports contained detailed and highly confidential information concerning foreign banks involved in illegal U.S. dollar clearing activities. Having improperly gleaned insights into the regulators’ concerns and strategies for investigating U-Turn-related misconduct, SCB asked D&T to delete from its draft ‘independent’ report any reference to certain types of payments that could ultimately reveal SCB’s Iranian U-Turn practices. In an email discussing D&T’s draft, a D&T partner admitted that ‘we agreed’ to SCB’s request because ‘this is too much and too politically sensitive for both SCB and Deloitte. That is why I drafted the watered-down version.’”

Deloitte did not immediately respond to a request for comment. However, the firm told Reuters, “Deloitte Financial Advisory Services performed its role as independent consultant properly and had no knowledge of any alleged misconduct by bank employees. Allegations otherwise are unsupported by the facts.”

5 Comments

If the allegations are even close to the truth what should happen to Deloitte??

If Penn State Football program got essentially a death penalty and there academic accredation is being questioned by the authorities, what should happen to D and T for their misdeeeds?

And then there were 3.

Posted by: notabadguy | August 17, 2012 9:43 PM

Report this Comment


If the allegations are even close to the truth what should happen to Deloitte??

If Penn State Football program got essentially a death penalty and there academic accredation is being questioned by the authorities, what should happen to D and T for their misdeeeds?

And then there were 3.

Posted by: notabadguy | August 17, 2012 9:43 PM

Report this Comment


I wonder if anyone at the NYS Department of Financial Services or at the Federal Reserve Bank thinks there might be anything wrong with SCB hiring their own independent consultant to review their records. I certainly do. Think about it folks - SCB is hiring the consultant, SCB is paying the consultant, who do we think the consultant is loyal to? In my professional (and personal) opinion, "independent" consultants should be hired and paid by the agency requiring the audit. Their should be a fund paid into by all banks that goes to pay for this because I would never suggest that our government or its agencies pay for anything because I know they won't anyway. But there should be an additional regulatory fee charged to banks on an annual basis to create and replenish this fund. Then auditors or consultants should be paid from this fund in order to maintain independence.

Posted by: bud_schulze@hotmail.com | August 8, 2012 5:02 PM

Report this Comment


It is a disservice to American's and our rights of free speech for allegations to be reported as facts. The article refers to a review report not an audit. The article refers to violations in 2004 to 2007 but the D&T report was to cover 2002 to 2004. I think the reporter's use of D&T in the headline is self-serving and focusing on D&T when it is the bank that is alleged to have committed the violations is a serious lack of objective reporting.

Posted by: complex500 | August 8, 2012 1:46 PM

Report this Comment


Who audits the auditors? These types of alleged activities will forever continue until one day there is true independence of all external auditors from clients in which auditing in a third-party activity assigned by a rotating randomly generated process and conducted aggressively for minimal fees with a cut of penalties assessed being the bonus. Bring on the good old days of real bank examiners and not cozy country-club client cover-ups.

Posted by: EnrolledAgent | August 8, 2012 10:29 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Women in Accounting: Where are the Leading Ladies?

May 17, 2013

Marcum’s Nanette Lee Miller and Janis Cowhey McDonagh sat down with managing editor Tamika Cody to discuss some of the obstacles women in the accounting profession face when trying to make their way into leadership positions.

IMA’s Jeff Thomson on the Role and Skills of Management Accountants

May 8, 2013

Institute of Management Accountants president and CEO Jeffrey Thomson discusses why accounting students should consider management accounting as a career, and the IMA's partnership with John Wiley & Sons.

Breaking out of Molds to Get Ahead

May 6, 2013

ConvergenceCoaching partner Jennifer Wilson talks with Accounting Today senior editor Danielle Lee about how female accountants can position themselves better for a promotion at their firms.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Tech Initiatives -- 2013

May 5, 2013

The AICPA's annual list of IT priorities for accounting firms.

Tax Stats: May 2013

April 30, 2013

Our monthly collection of statistics from the world of tax.

10 Biggest Estate Planning Mistakes

April 29, 2013

Help your clients avoid these common pitfalls.

Common E-mail Security Mistakes

April 23, 2013

These five bad habits can make your confidential information -- and that of your clients -- easy to steal.

The Art of the Tax Cartoon

April 9, 2013

A selection of tax cartoons from Philly tax firm Drucker & Scaccetti's 'Finding Humor in Taxes' exhibit.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement