Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox has established an advisory committee to help make financial reporting more "user-friendly." The SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting will examine the U.S. financial reporting system in an effort to reduce complexity, make financial reports clearer to investors reduce costs for preparers and determine how to better capitalize on the use of technology. "Our current system of financial reporting has become unnecessarily complex for investors, companies, and the markets generally," Cox said. "The time is ripe to review how that system can be made less complex and more useful to investors." Robert C. Pozen, chairman of MFS Investment Management in Boston and former vice chairman of Fidelity Investments, was appointed the committee chair. Cox said he expects between 13 and 17 additional members with varied backgrounds to be named to the advisory committee within the next few weeks.Some of the areas the committee will focus on include: * The current approach to setting financial accounting and reporting standards; * The current process of regulating compliance by registrants and financial professionals with accounting and reporting standards; and * The current systems for delivering financial information to investors and accessing that information. Both the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Financial Executives International lauded the development. "This advisory committee represents an important step toward addressing the institutional, structural, cultural, and behavioral issues that create complexity, reduce transparency, and impede usefulness of reported information to investors," said FASB chairman Robert Herz. Meanwhile the 15,000-member FEI said that it "applauds the SEC's announcement today regarding the formation of an SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting. We reiterate our belief that the current complexity in accounting and reporting harms the ability of users of financial statements to understand the information provided and impairs the ability of preparers to explain their financial results in a meaningful way."

The Internal Revenue Service ruled that a partial termination of a qualified plan occurred where 23 percent of a plan's participants were no longer active due to the closing of one of the employer's four locations. Therefore, all plan participants were fully vested. Under Code Section 411(d)(3), a plan is required to provide that, upon its partial termination, the rights of all affected employees to benefits up to the date of the termination must be non-forfeitable. Under the regs, the IRS uses a facts and circumstances test to determine whether a partial termination has occurred. The IRS ruled that if the turnover rate is 20 percent or more, there is a presumption that a partial termination of the plan has occurred. The IRS determined the turnover rate by dividing the number of participating employees who had an employer-initiated severance from employment during the applicable period - in this case, the plan year - by the sum of all of the participating employees at the start of the applicable period and the employees who became participants during the applicable period. The 20 percent threshold merely creates a presumption, according to the IRS. Facts and circumstances indicating that the turnover rate for an applicable period is routine, and not the result of a shutdown as in this instance, favor a finding that there is no partial termination. The IRS also noted that a partial termination of a qualified plan can also occur for reasons other than turnover. For instance, a partial termination can occur due to plan amendments that adversely affect the rights of employees to vest in benefits under the plan, plan amendments that exclude a group of employees who have previously been covered by the plan, or the reduction or cessation of future benefit accruals resulting in a potential reversion to the employer.

After collating some 80 comment letters on valuation guidance for financial reporting, the Financial Accounting Standards Board unveiled plans to form a resource group on the subject. Specifically, the cadre will provide the standard-setter with input on potential clarifying guidance on issues relating to the application FASB Statement No. 157 on Fair Value Measurements. FASB said the composition of the group will comprise of a cross section of constituents and added that its initial meeting will be sometime during the third quarter of 2007.

The Joint Committee on Taxation has issued a report on the individual alternative minimum tax in advance of a Senate Finance Committee hearing scheduled for Wed., June 27. The JCT report listed several selected reform options, which include: indexing or increasing the exemption amounts; allowing the deduction for personal exemptions and standard deductions to be used when computing the AMT; permitting state and local taxes against the AMT; reducing the minimum tax rates; eliminating the phase-out of the minimum tax exemption; allowing nonrefundable personal credits to offset the minimum tax after 2006; and repealing the AMT. The report is available at: http://www.house.gov/jct/x-38-07.pdf.

The LexisNexis Tax Center platform will now include exclusive content from Ernst & Young's International GAAP Online. Written by the International Financial Reporting Group of Ernst & Young, International GAAP Online includes the full text of every International Financial Reporting Standard and a set of model IFRS financial statements. LexisNexis has also paired with Danielle Rolfes, tax attorney and CPA with Ivins, Phillips & Barker, to present information on FIN 48. "There's a sea change that's less about the mechanics of FIN 48 and more abut rigorous accounting to give investors enhanced insight into companies' overall income tax positions and the consequent ability to scrutinize and compare," said Rolfes. LexisNexis launched its Tax Center last year to help streamline analysis of tax strategies across the broadest array of tax publishers available on a single platform, including LexisNexis, CCH, BNA, Tax Analysts, the ABA Section of Taxation and Matthew Bender.

The Internal Revenue Service is expanding an outreach effort to ensure that public schools throughout the United States are complying with the universal availability requirement for retirement annuities they may offer.Some schools and school districts may be overlooking offering employees the opportunity to participate in these retirement plans. To assess the level of compliance, the IRS's Employee Plans Compliance Unit has started sending questionnaires to public school districts in all 50 states under the 403(b) Universal Availability project. A 403(b) plan is a retirement plan for certain employees of public schools, employees of certain tax-exempt organizations, and certain ministers. "Our pilot project in three states showed fairly widespread noncompliance by schools with the universal availability requirement for 403(b) plans," said Joseph Grant, director of the IRS Employee Plans Division. "But we believe most of it was due to a lack of understanding about what the law requires, not a deliberate failure to comply." "We know from our pilot project and from talking to representatives from schools and districts across the country that most of the problems stem from either misunderstanding the law or from confusion because of differing rules in various states," said Grant. "The project will give schools the chance to identify problems with their plans and to correct them on their own."

The head of the body that oversees both the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board has petitioned Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell to veto a measure that would allow the state comptroller to set accounting standards and bypass GASB. Robert J. DeSantis, president and chief executive of the Financial Accounting Foundation, wrote to Rell requesting that she veto the legislation, which has already passed in both the Connecticut House and Senate. The legislation "threatens the integrity and objectivity of the independent standard-setting process and is a step backwards for public trust, government accountability, financial transparency and the state's investors," DeSantis wrote. Barry Melancon, president and chief executive of the American Institute of CPAs, also sent Rell correspondence urging a veto.