SCOTUS

Argued a century ago, Eisner v. Macomber helped establish the treatment of dividends.

The next steps in the ongoing responses to the Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. Wayfair decision.

In a case involving treaty rights versus state taxation, the justices narrowly decided in favor of tribal members.

In a 7-2 decision, the justices held that a railroad’s payment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury is taxable compensation.

The justices sided with a man trying to keep his Land Rover after he pleaded guilty to selling drugs.

The North Carolina appeal could have nationwide repercussions.

The Wayfair decision gave states the ability to start demanding billions of dollars in sales taxes from internet retailers that hadn’t been collecting them.

The ramifications of the Supreme Court sales tax decision go on and on.

The decision has implications for small to midsized businesses that must adapt to remain compliant.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision will have far-reaching implications for domestic companies, unless states and policy makers act to reduce the compliance burden.