More Debits & Credits Posts

U.S. to Lose Billions on Citigroup’s Tax Breaks

Print
Email
Reprints
December 16, 2009

The news that the IRS has granted Citigroup tax breaks potentially worth more money than it will be giving back in repaying its TARP funds should not come as a surprise.

Last Friday, the IRS issued a revenue ruling that will allow the bank to retain billions of dollars in tax breaks on its supposed losses, even though Congress passed a law earlier this year to specifically prevent banks like Wells Fargo from taking advantage of such tax breaks. There is some wiggle room since the government is basically saying that when the bank pays back the government its TARP funds, the bank isn’t really changing its ownership, so it shouldn’t be subject to restrictions on deducting its losses the same way a company that acquires a loss-making company would be.

But the main point is that the government wants to be free of the headaches of the politically controversial TARP, and Citigroup wants to be free of the restrictions on executive compensation that the remaining TARP recipients are still subject to. By freeing itself just in time for bonus season, the bank will be able to retain more employees who might be tempted to jump ship to rivals that are not operating under such restrictions, even if it will be putting itself in further debt by offering more shares of its stock to a skeptical investing public.

The bank may be helping temporarily refill the Treasury’s coffers a bit, but that won’t last for long when the IRS allows it to write off a nearly equivalent amount from its taxes, at least until the next time it needs a federal bailout.

Comments (1)
The author of this "news article" has more interest in giving a viewpoint than providing news. First of all, by selling new shares in C, it is increasing equity, not incurring debt, although it is at a cost to the current shareholders. And yes, the investing public is skeptical, which is reflected in C's awful current share price. That's the way the market works. And why shouldn't the banks be able to offset the very real losses incurred against current profits?
Posted by Sonny from Hoboken | Thursday, December 17 2009 at 9:03AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.