The New York State Society of CPAs has written to the Internal Revenue Service asking for a simplified method of electing deferral of U.S. taxation on Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans.
The NYSSCPA is also requesting additional guidance on the taxation of foreign retirement and pension plans due to consumer confusion over the filing procedures required by such programs.
As noted in a comment letter sent to the IRS on May 3, the IRS must consider mechanisms and policies for addressing potential inequities associated with foreign retirement plans.
“It is not the taxpayers’ intent to avoid taxation,” said the NYSSCPA International Taxation Committee Chair Melissa Gillespie. “One of the biggest issues we are seeing is a general lack of familiarity with foreign pensions and retirement plans and the related U.S. taxation.”
As noted in the Society’s comment letter, U.S. taxpayers with retirement or pension plans in Canada and other countries are genuinely surprised to discover that these plans, which they often cannot access and are meant to be invested and growing tax free, could be subject to U.S. tax and U.S. tax reporting.
The NYSSCPA is asking the IRS to simplify the election mechanism that saves US taxpayers from current U.S. taxation as the Canadian retirement savings plan derives income. The NYSSCPA also asked the IRS to address how to more equitably treat retirement savings plans from countries that do not have tax treaties similar to the U.S. – Canada agreement.
Currently, those who fail to timely file the election with respect to a Canadian retirement savings plan are either taxed on the retirement plan’s income or must apply for a private letter ruling from the IRS to make a late election. According to the comment letter, private letter rulings can be prohibitively expensive.
In order to address this issue, the NYSSCPA suggested that the IRS either treat all relevant taxpayers as having made the election, unless the taxpayer opts out, or create a streamlined process to facilitate late elections rather than requiring a full private letter ruling from the IRS.
For those with retirement savings accounts in countries that do not currently have specific tax treaties with the U.S., the NYSSCPA is asking the IRS to put forth legislation that would provide for the deferral of tax on foreign retirement plans which had compulsory participation required by the foreign country.
“Many taxpayers and tax-return preparers are unaware of the election mechanism and requirements,” said International Taxation Committee member Ryan Dudley. “To have no practical way to correct this oversight, when the result is accelerated tax on retirement savings, would be unjust.”












3 Comments
We, for the past 15+ years, treat clients as having made the election simply due the fact they didn't include RRSP earnings in income. A de facto election. The fact they didn't follow the Rev Proc was incidental. The deferral is allowed under the post 1980 treaty and protocols. We start with 3 years of 8891s on a 1040X, explained as "omitted in error" as a method of catching up.
The only other way to look at the situation is to say they failed to declare taxable income if they didn't make the election. That's not a workable solution in my mind.
I am aware that the 100% correct procedure is a PLR for a retroactive election. I know that it is not the only way to accomplish the same result. I have had clients pass an audit of RRSP withdrawals when they had just started filing 8891s with the date of the election showing either the first year the became US persons (or as U.S. citizens, contributed to an RRSP after 1980).
If we could get guidance of ANY type on how, or whether to, file 3520 forms for Canadian Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs) and Tax Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs)it would be more valuable. Even an ackowledgment that they exist would be welcomed.
All being said it is great to have the NYSSCPA push IRS on the issue simply as a matter of fairness for taxpayers.
Posted by: GARY | May 23, 2012 2:17 PM
Report this Comment
Citizens of the USA, should have thier investments within the USA.
Posted by: neparms | May 23, 2012 12:57 PM
Report this Comment
Bravo to the NYSSCPA! This makes me wonder how many of my clients who have acquired permanent resident or US citizen status might be subject to this situation and are possibly in a catch 22.
Posted by: EACPA1040 | May 21, 2012 10:50 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.