Free Site Registration


Revenue Recognition Standards Get Mixed Response

Print
Email
Reprints
Canton, Mass. (May 28, 2009)

Proposed contract-based standards for revenue recognition are attracting some support, but also raising questions, according to a new survey.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board proposed a new revenue recognition model last December for use in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The model provides a single revenue recognition principle based on changes in contractual assets and liabilities. FASB is asking for comment letters to be submitted by June 19, 2009.

RevenueRecognition.com, a Web site run by revenue management software vendor Softrax, worked with FASB and the IASB to develop questions for a survey about the proposed standard. The survey of senior finance executives at 515 companies found that 54 percent of them either agreed or strongly agreed that the proposed contract-based approach to revenue recognition would clarify the earning process.

Advertisement

However, 17 percent of the respondents were uncertain about the impact. The key concern was whether contracts could capture ongoing changes in complex business relationships efficiently enough to be the sole basis for revenue accounting.  

Two-thirds of the respondents said there would be little or no difference in the timing of their revenue recognition. But in industries such as construction, defense, engineering, services, and software, the impact is seen as potentially significant.

Over 70 percent of the respondents agreed with the boards’ proposal to use stand-alone pricing as the basis for allocating revenue recognition and that management should be allowed to use estimated prices under some circumstances. However, there were serious concerns about estimated prices. Respondents recommended that standard models be established, even if they have to be industry-specific, and that managers be required to disclose how the price estimates are made.

The boards proposed “performance obligation” as a single accounting unit to replace the use of “deliverables,” “elements” and ”components.” More than 70 percent of the senior finance executives surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that this would help them identify components of a contract more consistently than existing practice.

To view the full report, visit www.revenuerecognition.com.

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's New at Grant Thornton

May 14, 2012

CEO Stephen Chipman talks about his firm's new brand focus on growth, and its recent M&A activity.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Payroll Mistakes Companies Make

May 14, 2012

Keeping your clients from running afoul of IRS rules around payroll taxes will help them avoid stiff penalties.

10 Years of the Top 100 Firms

May 6, 2012

Tracking trends at the biggest firms in the U.S.

Best Accounting Firm Taglines

April 27, 2012

Our favorite slogans from around the profession.

Favorite Busy Season Activities

April 10, 2012

LinkedIn Accounting members share the best methods to bust stress and boost morale.

The Best Places to Be an Accountant 2012

March 27, 2012

From our 2012 Regional Leaders list, we rank the best parts of the country to operate an accounting firm.

More Wacky Tax Deductions

March 26, 2012

LinkedIn members point out some weird tax deductions their clients have suggested.

7 Tax-Free Benefits for Employees

April 15, 2012

Employee rewards Uncle Sam can't touch.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement