AICPA Aims to Enhance Audit Quality for Private Companies

The American Institute of CPAs has launched an initiative to improve audit quality at private companies.

As part of the process, the AICPA has released a discussion paper on the audit process of private entities summarizing the Institute’s efforts to help auditors excel in a fast-changing, complex business environment.

While CPAs provide a wide range of services, auditing is fundamental to the profession, the AICPA noted. With that in mind, the AICPA launched its Enhancing Audit Quality initiative in May.

“EAQ is a holistic effort to consider auditing of private entities—including private companies, not-for-profit organizations, employee benefit plans and governmental entities – through multiple touch points, especially where quality issues have emerged,” said AICPA president and CEO Barry C. Melancon in a statement. “Many AICPA committees, boards and staff contributed to the EAQ. The goal is to align the objectives of all audit-related AICPA efforts and collectively improve the quality of audit services delivered by the profession.”

The Center for Audit Quality and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have also been working on developing audit quality indicators, although those are mostly focused on publicly traded companies rather than privately held businesses (see CAQ Pilot Tests Audit Quality Indicators).

The AICPA’s EAQ initiative is based on a two-phase approach. Phase 1 involves planned and proposed efforts that will immediately improve quality. Some of the efforts have already been approved by various AICPA boards or committees and are under way, while others are ideas for exploration and comment.

Phase 2 centers around the transformation of the current peer review program for firms’ accounting and auditing engagements into a practice-monitoring process that marries technology with human oversight, and makes a closer, more real-time connection among a firm’s accounting and auditing engagements, the AICPA and the individuals performing the practice monitoring.

The discussion paper outlines the AICPA’s near- and longer-term plans and proposals to address quality issues related to financial statement audits of private entities. The more significant changes and efforts include:

Competence and Due Care – Align the CPA Exam with real-world practice for newly licensed CPAs; ensure that all CPAs who perform financial statement audits adhere to the requirements in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, including but not limited to competence and due care.

Auditing and Quality Control Standards – Monitor the use of the Auditing Standards Board’s new clarified auditing standards to ensure they are being consistently understood and implemented to achieve high-quality audits; identify and better understand where and how audit issues occur and their root causes so revisions can be made to the appropriate standards and/or guidance; consider whether more specificity is needed in the quality control standards to drive quality performance.
Guidance, Tools, Learning and Resources – Enhance curricula, content and methods of instruction to support the major topical areas the profession serves, including but not limited to challenging areas such as employee benefit plan audits, governmental audits and financial reporting; release a rigorous, profession-wide competency framework that has been validated by experts and regulators from around the globe; develop additional individual and suites of resources or educational courses based upon areas of concern uncovered in peer reviews.

Practice Monitoring (Peer Review) – Perform more extensive peer review procedures on high-risk and complex areas and engagements; address the risks posed by low-volume auditors of high-risk and complex engagements by requiring the firm, in all cases where material non-conformity with applicable professional standards is noted, to engage a third party to perform pre- or post-issuance reviews of those engagements in the future with periodic reporting to a peer review report acceptance body; evaluate firms’ engagements in “new” industries promptly, rather than waiting for their next peer review.

Ethics Enforcement – Use publicly available information to proactively identify deficient audits (including governmental single audits and employee benefit plan audits) and require members to correct the deficiencies; consider sanctions, including admonishment, suspension or expulsion from AICPA membership, when a firm has failed to provide the AICPA Peer Review Program with a complete list of engagements that should be subject to review. The AICPA’s action would be reported to the appropriate regulators.

“Integrity and objectivity are core values for the CPA profession,” said AICPA chairman Bill Balhoff. “Additionally, CPAs focus heavily on providing quality services for clients, including audit services. Consistently performing high-quality audits is dependent upon adequate education and training, compliance with auditing and quality control standards, and experience working in specialized areas. Through the EAQ, the AICPA will reinforce the quality of audit services for private entities and address any issues that may be identified.”

The EAQ initiative is being led by AICPA senior vice president for public practice & global alliances Susan Coffey, who encourages stakeholders in the U.S. private entity audit process to engage in a dialogue on the AICPA’s plans.

Visit aicpa.org/EAQpaper to post responses to questions in the paper and provide other feedback or to see interested parties’ input. Comments or letters also may be provided via email to EAQ@aicpa.org. Input is due Nov. 7.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Audit Associations
MORE FROM ACCOUNTING TODAY