The International Federation of Accountants is revising its Statements of Membership Obligations, starting today, requiring professional accounting organizations worldwide to align with its quality management standards and offer more flexible pathways to the accounting profession.
The
Some of the main changes include alignment with international quality management standards to strengthen firm-level systems; encouragement of more flexible pathways into the accounting profession, in accordance with international education standards; along with integration of expanded public sector reporting standards issued by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board and expanded corporate reporting standards from the International Sustainability Standards Board.
"These revisions help IFAC members continue to lead with integrity and excellence, ensuring their organizations remain resilient, innovative and trusted worldwide," said IFAC CEO Lee White in a statement Tuesday. "By following the SMOs, our members strengthen the adoption of international standards, reinforce quality and public interest systems, and demonstrate the collective strength of a truly global accountancy profession."
The IFAC board approved the revisions to Statements of Membership Obligations in February. IFAC has
The AICPA is a member of IFAC, and it has been encouraging more states to offer
"Since the Board issued a concept release in 2020, one goal of this project was to establish a robust standard that requires firms to design quality management systems tailored to the specific risks of their practices," he said. "At the same time, the PCAOB also sought to minimize differences with the International Standard on Quality Management, or ISQM1, to promote one globally consistent standard for designing and maintaining an effective quality control system. That remains an important objective. We continue to want a standard that is rigorous, principles-based, and harmonized, to the extent appropriate, with ISQM1. As some stakeholders have observed and articulated in comment letters throughout the standard setting process, certain requirements included in QC 1000 may be unnecessary for the standard to meet the regulatory objectives of the PCAOB and may not contribute to audit quality."






