Accounting errors tucked away in footnotes may be less likely to draw the attention of auditors, says a new report authored by accounting professors from Cornell University and Bentley College. According to The Wall Street Journal, the report said that auditors are more likely to demand that clients correct errors and misstatements when the numbers in question for such things as stock options appear in the books, as opposed to footnotes. The study said that "information location influences reliability." As part of the research project, auditors were questioned as to how they how they would handle a client's underestimation of employee stock options with the client objecting to making an adjustment. One group was told that the client included the cost of stock options on its income statement; others were told that the cost was shown only in a footnote -- with the error being of identical size. The percentage of auditors demanding a correction when the mistake was on the books was far greater than when the error was recorded in a footnote.
-
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board today sanctioned Goldman & Company, CPA's, Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton, and PWR CPAs.
11h ago -
The Senate passed a bipartisan bill that would provide tax-filing relief for taxpayers in states that have issued state-level disaster declarations, sending the bill to President Trump for his signature.
11h ago -
Wiss hosts third annual summer financial literacy program; Schneider Downs adds five shareholders; and more news from across the profession.
July 11 -
Plus, Abacus announces $6.6 million seed funding for agentic AI assistants; and other news and updates from the accounting tech arena.
July 11 -
Underhanded underground; down on the farm; reality check; and other highlights of recent tax cases.
July 10 -
Smith + Howard, an Atlanta-based Top 100 Firm, has opened two new tax practices: site selection + incentives and state and local income tax consulting.
July 10