Accounting errors tucked away in footnotes may be less likely to draw the attention of auditors, says a new report authored by accounting professors from Cornell University and Bentley College. According to The Wall Street Journal, the report said that auditors are more likely to demand that clients correct errors and misstatements when the numbers in question for such things as stock options appear in the books, as opposed to footnotes. The study said that "information location influences reliability." As part of the research project, auditors were questioned as to how they how they would handle a client's underestimation of employee stock options with the client objecting to making an adjustment. One group was told that the client included the cost of stock options on its income statement; others were told that the cost was shown only in a footnote -- with the error being of identical size. The percentage of auditors demanding a correction when the mistake was on the books was far greater than when the error was recorded in a footnote.
-
The Internal Revenue Service previewed a draft form for crypto brokers for reporting on the proceeds of digital asset transactions to their customers.
49m ago -
Seventeen percent of comment forms in 2021 and 2022 contained auditor evaluation deficiencies, according to the PCAOB.
1h ago -
KPMG enters $1.1 million partnership with Women's Health Access Matters; UHY releases nonprofit trends report; and more news from across the profession.
4h ago -
Plus, LeaseCrunch announces webinar on lease changes and remeasurements; and other accounting technology updates.
4h ago -
While still a minority in the accounting world, remote partners offer unique benefits amid talent shortages.
6h ago -
Remote partners bring many advantages, but firms do need a little more thought when it comes to managing them.
6h ago