In a rebuke to the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, the Tax Court has invalidated regulations under Section 482 of the Tax Code that require the sharing of stock-based compensation.
In a July 27, 2015 division opinion, Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3, the 15-judge panel agreed with taxpayer Altera Corp. that the regulations were arbitrary and capricious because they were not the product of a reasoned decision-making standard as required by the Supreme Court in its State Farm decision.
The court ruled that Xilinx Inc. v. Commissioner, 125 T.C. 37 (2005) held that, under 1995 cost-sharing regulations, controlled entities entering into qualified cost-sharing agreements need not share stock-based compensation costs because parties operating at arm’s length would not do so. In 2003, the Treasury Department issued regulations requiring controlled parties entering into such cost-sharing agreements to share stock-based compensation costs.
The IRS made deficiency determinations based on Section 482 allocations it made under the regulations. Both the IRS and Altera filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment, with Altera contending that the regulation is arbitrary and capricious.
The court held that the regulation is a legislative rule, not an interpretive rule, and is therefore subject to the Administrative Procedures Act.
The Treasury failed to support its belief that unrelated parties would share stock-based compensation costs with any evidence in the administrative record, according to the court. “The final rule fails to satisfy State Farm’s reasoned decision-making standard and is therefore invalid,” it stated.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Accounting Today content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access