In a decision at odds with five other circuit courts, the Tenth Circuit quashed IRS summonses that were issued after the 23-day notice requirement of Section 7609(a)(1) of the Tax Code. As a result, the issue could be ripe for Supreme Court review.
The IRS issued four summonses to banks in the Eastern and Western Districts of Oklahoma for records involving nursing homes owned by Sam Jewell. Because the IRS waited too long to mail the notices to Jewell, he received the notices less than 23 days before the records were to be examined. Alleging inadequate notice, Jewell filed petitions to quash the summonses in the Eastern and Western Districts of Oklahoma
The two courts split on how to interpret the notice requirement, with the Western District agreeing with the IRS and the Eastern District granting Jewell’s petition to quash. Jewell appealed the Western District ruling, and the government appealed the Eastern District ruling.
The Tenth Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Oklahoma and reversed the ruling of the Western District on Monday.
The court noted that the Tax Code provides that notice of the summons “shall” be given within 23 days before the date of the examination. While the government characterized the delay in mailing as a technical default and that “shall” does not always signify a mandatory intent, the Tenth Circuit said the cases cited “did not disturb the age-old precept that shall’ means shall.’”
“Though we do not lightly create a circuit split, we are obliged to follow Supreme Court precedent, even when it might be viewed as inequitable’ or as form over substance,’” the court stated.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Accounting Today content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access