SCOTUS

At issue is how far states can go in taxing those who cross borders.

A look at the taxation of trusts and the Supreme Court’s recent ruling.

The Supreme Court decision in Kaestner harkens back to Quill.

Time is tight for Donald Trump’s lawyers in their fight to keep the president’s financial records out of the hands of congressional Democrats.

The case has applicability to all administrative agencies, including the IRS, and their ability to issue authoritative regulations and guidance.

The House Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved a bill to allow same-sex couples who married before the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down by the Supreme Court to claim tax refunds.

The court unanimously agreed that a non-contingent beneficiary's residence was not enough of a reason for a state to tax a trust.

The 26-year history of the case began as an audit procedure and evolved into a constitutional issue.

An ideologically divided U.S. Supreme Court gave businesses more power to channel disputes into individual arbitration proceedings, siding with a lighting retailer trying to prevent its employees from pressing group claims stemming from a phishing attack.

The justices questioned a state’s ability to tax income from a trust based on the beneficiaries residing there before taking any distributions.