SCOTUS

The year 2019 was a continuation of the banner year of 2018 for major law and administrative changes in sales and use tax compliance, inspired and driven in large part by the Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v Wayfair.

SCOTUS will hear arguments in March, and likely rule by the end of June.

A U.S. Supreme Court justice temporarily blocked subpoenas that would force Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One Financial Corp. to turn over years of President Donald Trump’s financial documents to two House committees.

The president wants the justices to decide whether he has to hand over records held by his accounting firm, Mazars.

Lawmakers say Congress has broad authority to investigate misconduct by the president.

The president urged the court for the second time in as many days to insulate him from an investigation.

The president's attorneys filed a high-stakes appeal that aims to give the president broad immunity from criminal investigations while in office.

For the second time in less than a week President Donald Trump said he’ll go to the U.S. Supreme Court to appeal court rulings threatening to expose his tax records.

The justices rejected two appeals including one filed by the founders of Edelman Shoe Inc.

At issue is how far states can go in taxing those who cross borders.

A look at the taxation of trusts and the Supreme Court’s recent ruling.

The Supreme Court decision in Kaestner harkens back to Quill.

Time is tight for Donald Trump’s lawyers in their fight to keep the president’s financial records out of the hands of congressional Democrats.

The case has applicability to all administrative agencies, including the IRS, and their ability to issue authoritative regulations and guidance.

The House Ways and Means Committee unanimously approved a bill to allow same-sex couples who married before the Defense of Marriage Act was struck down by the Supreme Court to claim tax refunds.

The court unanimously agreed that a non-contingent beneficiary's residence was not enough of a reason for a state to tax a trust.

The 26-year history of the case began as an audit procedure and evolved into a constitutional issue.

An ideologically divided U.S. Supreme Court gave businesses more power to channel disputes into individual arbitration proceedings, siding with a lighting retailer trying to prevent its employees from pressing group claims stemming from a phishing attack.

The justices questioned a state’s ability to tax income from a trust based on the beneficiaries residing there before taking any distributions.

Argued a century ago, Eisner v. Macomber helped establish the treatment of dividends.