Practice Management

Tax software publisher CCH continued making an aggressive push into the small practitioner market, announcing its second major acquisition in as many months.The Wolters Kluwer business, which produces the ProSystem fx Office line of accounting and business software products, signaled its determination to take on the marketplace leader, Intuit Inc.'s QuickBooks, by striking a pact to purchase TaxWise Corp.

During the past 15 years, I have had the opportunity to read and analyze nearly 150 partnership agreements, and it always amazes me how outdated and inadequate so many of them are.There are basically two major reasons for this. First, many firms just fail to give adequate attention to their partnership agreements. Second, over the years, the firm may have modified its original agreement or made separate agreements as new partners entered, and these agreements are significantly different from one another. None of the agreements have been consolidated into one current agreement.

H&R BLOCK, BANK REACH $39M SETTLEMENT: Tax prep giant H&R Block Inc. announced that a federal judge has approved a $39 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit brought by customers over the company's refund anticipation loans. The U.S. district court judge approved the settlement, the group's third effort to reach an agreement in the suit, which has dragged on since 1998. Block and co-defendant Beneficial National Bank - now owned by London-based HSBC - will split the payment.The lawsuit is one of several alleging that Block failed to disclose high costs and other features of RALs made to more than 17 million clients over a 13-year period.

Tax advisors are likely to hear from potential clients seeking advice on how to "re-enter" our tax reporting system.The reasons for failing to file tax returns vary with the client: the stress of a divorce or bankruptcy, ignorance of U.S. tax laws, or willful negligence. Similarly, the strategies for handling these cases should vary, considering the potential criminal, as well as civil, ramifications of a client's failure to file timely returns.

Deductible individual retirement accounts and Roth IRAs have been an attractive part of a retirement portfolio - if a taxpayer qualified for their use. The problem was that various income eligibility limits prevented many from taking advantage of IRAs.Nondeductible IRAs were generally available, but were often viewed as unattractive, since they offered only tax deferral on earnings - they offered no upfront deduction and required taxation at ordinary income rates on distribution and mandatory distributions starting at age 70-1/2.

In consideration of the continuing impact of Hurricane Katrina, the Internal Revenue Service has further postponed filing and payment requirements for businesses until Oct. 16, 2006, which is the same deadline established earlier for certain individual filers.The postponement now applies to individual, corporation, partnership, estate, trust, S corporation, generation-skipping, employment and certain excise tax returns with original or extended due dates that fall on or after Aug. 29, 2005, but before Oct. 16, 2006.

The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel has sent the Internal Revenue Service recommendations for easing taxpayer burdens in five areas.In a 12-page report dated Aug. 18, the panel made the following suggestions:

To divine the true meaning of a gap, I usually need to go beyond calculating the difference between my gross pay and net pay on the 15th and 30th of each month.That my friends, is Webster’s unabridged definition of a gap.

The share of income taxes paid by the top half of taxpayers reached its highest level in decades according to a report from the Joint Economic Committee.

A slow response to a Freedom of Information Act request has lead the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center to sue the Internal Revenue Service. The center said that the documents requested in March 2005 are related to the rejection of its application for non-profit status in the early 1970s. In the court filing, the center accuses the IRS of attempting to “cover up its misconduct,” while chief executive Lorri Jean has said members are interested in reviewing the documents as a historical exercise. In October 2005, the center said it had received a written response to its information request from the IRS, which said that the documents had been located and were being reviewed by the IRS Office of Collection Policy. Since then, the center has not received any updates on its request. According to the center, then operating as the "Gay Community Services Center," it was the first organization with the word "gay" in its name to apply for non-profit status from the federal government. That application was rejected on the grounds that the center was not "organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes." Following several appeals, the IRS eventually awarded the center non-profit standing in August 1974, but included a number of caveats -- including that the center would not "contend that homosexuality is normal" and that the center's officers and directors not be “avowed homosexuals." Among the documents requested on behalf of the center are all records analyzing, discussing or considering its original 501(c)(3) application; a copy of the original IRS denial letter; all records in conjunction with the original denial letter; and all records in conjunction with the later IRS approval letter. The lawsuit requests that the court order the IRS to produce the requested records, provide a detailed explanation of why the requested documents were withheld and reimburse the center for its legal fees.