The President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform has compiled the witness list for the sixth meeting of the group, scheduled for March 31, here. On the first panel, titled "Overview of International Tax Systems," the speakers will be Willard Taylor, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP; Mihir Desai, an associate professor at the Rock Center for Entrepreneurship of Harvard Business School; Jeffrey Owens, director of the OECD Center on Tax Policy and Administration; Larry Langdon, a partner at Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP and former commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service's Large and Mid-Size Business Division. The second panel, "How Taxes Affect Business Decisions," will hear testimony from Paul Otellini, president and chief operating officer of Intel Corp.; and Robert Grady, managing director of The Carlyle Group. The final panel, "Impact of Taxes on Savings, Investment, and Economic Growth," will hear from Michael Boskin, the Tully M. Friedman Professor of Economics and senior fellow at Stanford University and the Hoover Institute; Alan Auerbach, the Robert D. Burch Professor of Economics and Law at the University of California, Berkeley. Also, renowned economist Milton Friedman will speak to the reform panel on "Perspectives on Tax Reform."

A ruling by the Tax Court has underscored the way in which the alternative minimum tax penalizes holders of incentive stock options when the stock loses value after the option is exercised. Ronald Speltz thought that his employer was doing him a favor by issuing him ISOs to augment his salary, which was less than $100,000 a year. Instead, the ISOs triggered a tax nightmare when he exercised them before the tech bubble burst, leaving him with nearly worthless stock but with an unexpected tax bill of nearly $225,000. Although Speltz and his wife borrowed $134,000 to help pay state and federal taxes, and offered the cash value of his life insurance policy as a compromise for the remainder, the Internal Revenue Service rejected his offer. The Tax Court agreed. Even though the offer-in-compromise provisions include a compromise to promote effective tax administration -- explained by the regs to cover situations "where collection in full could be achieved but would cause economic hardship" -- the court found that the Speltz's had sufficient income to meet "basic living expenses" and therefore didn't qualify. The court said that it sympathized with the situation, but it is up to Congress, not the courts or the IRS, to come up with a solution.

More people have used Free File so far this year than for all of last year, according to the latest figures from the Internal Revenue Service. As of March 16, 3.55 million tax returns have gone through Free File, up 44 percent compared to the same time last year and exceeding last year's total of 3.51 million. Now in its third year, Free File is a partnership between the IRS and a consortium of tax software manufacturers. Electronic filing continues to surge, with e-filed returns running 7 percent ahead of last year. Of the 67 million returns filed as of March 18, 68 percent were e-filed. While this percentage will decline as April 15 approaches, the IRS said it expects that for the first time more than half of all individual tax returns will be electronically filed this year.

The investigative flap over a charity ranch run by combative national radio host Don Imus is over. According to published reports, an official from the New York State Attorney General's charities office wrote to the gruff radio personality telling him that "no further inquiries concerning the Ranch are needed at this time," thus ending the probe launched by AG Eliot Spitzer. The 64-year-old Imus and his wife Deirdre, operate "The Imus Ranch" a 4,000-acre parcel in New Mexico for critically ill children. The ranch became the subject of an unflattering profile in the March 24 edition of The Wall Street Journal, which drew comparisons of the unusually high costs associated with the ranch -- $2.6 million per year for 100 children -- and compared them to other well-known charitable camps such as actor Paul Newman's "Hole in the Wall Gang." The piece detailed the Spitzer probe and questioned the Imus' personal use of the property without reimbursing the ranch. Spitzer's office said the inquiry was launched when the charity requested an extension to file tax data and that the AG's office had received an anonymous letter urging it to investigate Imus's use of the ranch. The cantankerous Imus, known for wearing his trademark 10-gallon hats on the air, labeled the WSJ reporter, Robert Frank, a "punk" and "dishonest," claiming that he (Frank) refused to come to the ranch and that he interviewed him (Imus) just one day before the article appeared. During his morning broadcast, Imus maintained that he never personally benefited from the ranch. "I'm not getting anything out of this other than having fun helping the children," he said. However, Paul Steiger, the Journal's long-time managing editor, said the article was fair and accurate and written by "one of our most experienced and capable reporters."

Expert witnesses at the fifth meeting of the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform here, advised the reform group to proceed with extreme caution with regard to the adoption of a national sales tax and changes to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Robert Greenstein, founder and executive director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told the panel that a consumption tax could be implemented but would carry with it a string of collateral problems such as calls for exemptions and exclusions. Louisiana treasurer John Kennedy said that a sales tax was "not as simple as it might first appear." He added that a sales-and-use tax provides 37 percent of the state's revenue, but advised the panel to examine any and all issues Louisiana had with the state-wide levy. When addressing the merits of the EITC Kennedy also told the panel that it had "done more than any other program to lift people out of poverty." Greenstein pointed out that the EITC increases work efforts while slashing welfare among single parents. Next week the Tax Reform panel will host its sixth meeting, scheduled for March 31, at Fort Mason Center, Landmark Building A, San Francisco. The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m.

Taxpayers participating in "Son of Boss" tax shelter settlements have so far paid in more than $3.2 billion, a figure that should top $3.5 billion when the project concludes in the coming months, according to the Internal Revenue Service. Son of Boss, an offshoot of an earlier shelter called Boss ("bond and option sales strategy") was an abusive transaction aggressively marketed in the late 1990s and 2000 primarily to wealthy individuals. Both the Boss and Son of Boss shelters were structured using derivatives, noted Selva Ozelli, CPA, an international tax attorney with RIA. "Derivatives were used because of their uncertain tax treatment, limited financial statement disclosure and uncertainty regarding their valuation," she said. The settlement initiative required taxpayers to concede 100 percent of the claimed tax losses and pay a penalty of either 10 percent or 20 percent, unless they previous disclosed the transactions to the IRS. "This was a particularly bad shelter, and we're glad so many chose to get right with the government," said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. "Despite the tough terms we offered, two-thirds of Son of Boss participants have come forward and paid up." Thus far, nearly 1,200 Son of Boss taxpayers have settled with the IRS. Typical settlements were about $1 million, while 18 taxpayers forked over $20 million apiece, and one paid a whopping $100 million. Based on disclosures that the IRS has received from promoter investigations and from investor lists from Justice Department litigation, the agency determined that over 1,800 people participated in Son of Boss. "For those who didn't come forward, we know who they are," Everson said. "We are going after them."

The IRS has released Rev. Proc. 2005-13, which details the limitations on depreciation deductions for owners of passenger automobiles first placed in service during calendar year 2005. Special tables of limitations on depreciation deductions are also provided for trucks and vans, and for passenger automobiles designed to be propelled primarily by electricity and built by an original equipment manufacturer (electric automobiles). In addition, the revenue procedure details the amounts to be included in income by lessees of passenger automobiles first leased during calendar year 2005, including a separate table of inclusion amounts for lessees of trucks and vans, and a separate table for lessees of electric automobiles.