Free Site Registration


Companies Had to Cope with 270 Tax Changes in Q2

Print
Email
Reprints
New York (August 8, 2011)

By Michael Cohn, Accounting Today

Multinational companies needed to deal with 270 tax changes in the U.S. and globally in the second quarter of this year, according to a new report.

Carla Yrjanson

The latest ONESOURCE Indirect Tax Report from Thomson Reuters showed that there were a total of 184 changes in the U.S., 86 percent of which were either tax increases or new taxes. In addition, there were 86 changes internationally in value-added taxes. Thomson Reuters said that for the first and second quarters combined, there was a total of 2,073 changes.

The report found that general sales tax revenue turned out to be the second largest source of income for local government. Each tax change can represents a significant operational and cash flow outlay for businesses.

Advertisement

“When considering the impact that sales and use tax has on a business, financial executives should mainly be concerned with the number of changes in a given year,” said Carla Yrjanson, vice president of tax research and dontent for the Tax & Accounting business of Thomson Reuters. “For a business that runs its sales tax function completely in-house, just one sales tax change requires substantial operational resources.”

Internationally, the report found, there were 13 tax increases, one tax decrease, six new taxes and 64 product taxability changes.

In the U.S., there were 111 tax increases, 48 new taxes and 25 decreases. On the state level, there was one state change, 16 county changes, 90 city changes and 77 transit changes in the second quarter.

As of the second quarter of 2011, California continued to have the highest state tax rate at 7.25 percent. However, after a July 1 reduction to 6.25 percent, California no longer has the highest state tax rate. Indiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Rhode Island and Tennessee are at 7 percent, compared to the average state sales tax rate of 5.52 percent in Q2 2011. However, this only represents the state-designated portion of the sales tax, not the total combined state, county and city rate.

Sitka, Alaska continued to have the highest county tax rate at 6 percent. Several boroughs/counties were tied for the second highest rates at 5 percent, including Hinsdale, Colo.; Juneau, Alaska; Chambers, Ala.; Tuscaloosa, Ala.; Iberville Parish, La.; Orleans Parish, La.; St. Bernard Parish, La.; and St Charles, La., compared to the average county sales tax rate of 1.15 percent in second quarter, 2011. However, those figures only represent the borough or county-designated portion of the sales tax, not the total combined state, county and city rate.

Alaska has 10 of the 11 highest city rates in the country, with Wrangell at 7 percent, followed by Bethel, Buckland, Cordova, Dillingham, Hoonah, Kodiak, Kotzebue, Petersburg, and Thorne Bay at 6 percent compared to the average city sales tax of 1.67 percent in the second quarter of 2011. However, these figures only represent the city-designated portion of the sales tax, not the total combined state, county and city rate.

Several cities in Arizona also were found to have high combined tax rates. Tuba City, Ariz., has the highest combined sales tax rate (including state, county and city) at 13.725 percent, followed by Kayenta at 12.1 percent, Fredonia at 11.725 percent, and Coconino County at 11.725 percent. The average combined rate was 8.34 percent in second quarter, 2011.

3 Comments

The comment regarding Sitka, Alaska is not that the total combined rate (state/county/city) for that county is the highest but that the county designated portion of the total combined rate is the highest. Whereas, any county desginated portion of the sales tax in Wyoming is not more than 2%.

Posted by: bernadettes | August 10, 2011 4:29 PM

Report this Comment


Hmm- the comment that the highest county rate of 6% is in Alaska - there are many Wyoming counties with a 6% rate. BUT, neither Alaska nor Wyoming have a state income tax. The article seems misleading.

Posted by: VIMA | August 9, 2011 10:01 AM

Report this Comment


So this is on top of what the Dems wanted to do to increase revenues. Amazing. On the opposite side of the coin, it does not sound as if the Republicans have had not a lot of success in stopping tax increases, either. Maybe it is time for the government to be transparent and honest with the public.

Just as bad is with so many changes just from the US, the costs to companies is very large in learning, applying and planning for the tax impacts. With such a burden, it is little wonder companies are still moving offshore to escape the tax web of the US. Maybe it is time to enact legislation to require a supermajority vote by each party to pass tax legislation.

Posted by: BrianL | August 9, 2011 9:54 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Advertisement
Advertisement

What's New at Grant Thornton

May 14, 2012

CEO Stephen Chipman talks about his firm's new brand focus on growth, and its recent M&A activity.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Payroll Mistakes Companies Make

May 14, 2012

Keeping your clients from running afoul of IRS rules around payroll taxes will help them avoid stiff penalties.

10 Years of the Top 100 Firms

May 6, 2012

Tracking trends at the biggest firms in the U.S.

Best Accounting Firm Taglines

April 27, 2012

Our favorite slogans from around the profession.

Favorite Busy Season Activities

April 10, 2012

LinkedIn Accounting members share the best methods to bust stress and boost morale.

The Best Places to Be an Accountant 2012

March 27, 2012

From our 2012 Regional Leaders list, we rank the best parts of the country to operate an accounting firm.

More Wacky Tax Deductions

March 26, 2012

LinkedIn members point out some weird tax deductions their clients have suggested.

7 Tax-Free Benefits for Employees

April 15, 2012

Employee rewards Uncle Sam can't touch.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement