A pair of Republican members of Congress have introduced a bill to prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from implementing a new tax-reporting requirement for small businesses to reconcile their 1099-K reports from outside providers such as credit card companies with their own internal records.

Aaron Schock
The bill, known as the 1099-K Overreach Prevention Act, was introduced last week by Congressmen Aaron Schock, R-Ill., and Bobby Schilling, R-Ill. The bill targets a relatively new requirement for merchant card and third-party network payers to report the proceeds of payment card and third-party network transactions, such as credit and debit card transactions.
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 requires the IRS to collect a 1099-K from third-party payment entities, such as credit card companies. The 1099-K will show all credit transactions within a merchant’s business for the year. However, according to the lawmakers, the IRS is using the 1099-K to add extra burdens on small business tax forms by requiring them to reconcile this report with the merchants own internal numbers, which was not the original goal of the law.
Advertisement
Customers asking for cash back, returning merchandise bought on credit for cash, or collecting the deposits for rentals can all lead to discrepancies when reconciliation occurs, they pointed out.
As many small businesses don't have the specialized accounting software, bookkeeping technology, time, or personnel to cross-reference and reconcile their own internal numbers with third-party generated numbers, the reconciliation requirement increases the accounting workload and costs for small businesses, according to the lawmakers.
The 1099K Overreach Prevention Act prevents the IRS from using the 1099-K data to require new reconciliatory calculations on the part of the small business, returning this provision to the intent of the law when it was enacted.
Senator John Thune, R-S.D., plans to introduce similar legislation in the Senate.
“This is an unnecessary IRS requirement that will only lead to more accounting headaches for businesses,” Schock said in a statement. “My concern is that the IRS is asking for flawed information from small businesses by requiring them to reconcile their internal numbers with that of third-party entities. When you take into consideration all of the types of merchant transactions that occur between a customer and a small business all this adds up to unnecessary administrative costs, a new accounting burden, and more time away from growing their business. At a time when there is still record unemployment, adding another job killing regulation on small businesses is not the right solution.”
Schilling said that when he speaks with small business owners, he frequently hears that they are burdened with too much complicated and time-consuming paperwork already. “For small companies, the cost of tax compliance is already $1,584 a year,” he said. “If not overturned, this IRS requirement will undoubtedly add to that cost. It is wrong to weigh down the very folks we are asking to put Americans back to work and lead us into economic recovery.”
The bill has won the backing of officials from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business.
“We want to applaud Congressmen Schock and Schilling for introducing a bill that will restrict the IRS from placing this unprecedented paperwork mandate on the backs of small businesses who accept merchant payment cards,” said Giovanni Coratolo, vice president of small business policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Unless the IRS eliminates this directive, 8 to 10 million businesses will be subjected to the folly of data collection and paperwork rather than focusing on adding jobs and growing the economy.”
“Small-business owners across the country are thankful for the leadership from Congressmen Schock and Schilling to repeal this new IRS demand. This new requirement for small-business owners is more than a mere paperwork burden, it is an additional complication in an already complicated tax-reporting process,” said National Federation of Independent Business CEO Dan Danner. “The Tax Code, as it currently stands, ultimately puts the small-business owner at a disadvantage with compliance and their ability to succeed in business is falling further and further behind government demands on their time.”






7 Comments
I can't understand all of the complaints.
If the sales were all by checks, and properly deposited, all returns are noted on tax returns (by golly there is even a line for them), and all fees are deducted. All this is required record keeping, unless the business wants to over report profits.
So, what is the problem? Other than not being able to under report income.
I know that no one should have to pay any taxes according to many. But then who will fix the potholes in your streets. Or deliver your garbage to the landfill?
Posted by: tego@verizon.net | February 8, 2012 11:09 PM
Report this Comment
i deal in an industry that the credit cards are deposited to a merchants account. alledgedly the merchant is supposed to issue a 1099-k. since another third party reports the credit card tranactions to them (let's say $20,000,000) the merchants account is a conduit, issues checks to a recipient who took the credit card. the merchant has no proprietary rights to a program that would allow them to issue form 1099-k. so on the irs transcript would show $20,000,000 in income with no offset. insanity. how many cpa's are involved in this process of administering taxes e
Posted by: ROTH1947 | February 8, 2012 12:39 PM
Report this Comment
What are you being sarcastic when you say "which was not the original goal of the law." Really I in 30 years of accounting and tax preparation have seen that phrase so many times - I wish I had a nickle for each time - I'd be a millionare. They always say that - like their sorry. Then do it again and again and again. Case in point the Health Care Initative - and that isn't going to be a burden on small business. Or the recent 1099 vendor payments, which that goodness got shut down. It seems to me that they never consider what the burden is going to be or how much time the small business is going to spend on compliance. And the cost benefit on this one is just not there period!
Posted by: cdr51 | February 8, 2012 11:19 AM
Report this Comment
Simple solution (kiss) Advise small businesses to trash their credit card machines and start using cash again. The government loves to print new money!
Posted by: bob s | February 8, 2012 10:53 AM
Report this Comment
AH! but the article is only the tip of the berg so to speak, what about taxes and fees collected for the states on a credit card - we historically have not reported that as revenue. Or what about tips in restaurants, that's not revenue. AND the IRS is apt to make assumptions about who is reporting all of the cash revenue they assume goes unreported based on these 1099-K's - we all know what assume breaks down to - and I for one don't want to be fooling around trying to refute stupid assumptions.
Posted by: mgmcpa | February 8, 2012 10:46 AM
Report this Comment
I wonder if Ivan R is being sarcastic when he wrote: "I am surprised that Republicans would do such a thing........". Republicans are usually the party who try to protect businesses from excessive governmentr regulations . There is no doubt though that reconciling the diffferences between the proposed 1099 K is not only expensive but also a nightmare, specially for small businesses who give refunds that are not reflected in the records of the 1099 K issuers.
Posted by: Linor34b | February 8, 2012 8:56 AM
Report this Comment
I am surprised that Republicans would do such a thing. This is something that is typically done from the Democratic party, but truly, discrepancies can be an issue when reconciliation occurs.
Posted by: RO-CPA | February 7, 2012 7:53 PM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.