President Obama urged Congress to work across party lines on an overhaul of both corporate and individual taxes to reduce tax loopholes during his State of the Union address on Tuesday night.

“Over the years, a parade of lobbyists has rigged the tax code to benefit particular companies and industries,” he said. “Those with accountants or lawyers to work the system can end up paying no taxes at all. But all the rest are hit with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. It makes no sense, and it has to change. So tonight, I’m asking Democrats and Republicans to simplify the system. Get rid of the loopholes. Level the playing field. And use the savings to lower the corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years—without adding to our deficit.”
Obama also called for simplifying the individual tax code. “In fact, the best thing we could do on taxes for all Americans is to simplify the individual tax code,” he said. “This will be a tough job, but members of both parties have expressed interest in doing this, and I am prepared to join them.”
Advertisement
Obama cited some of the progress made in the past year on taxes during his hour-long speech, including the budget deal he worked out last month to extend the Bush-era tax cuts. “Thanks to the tax cuts we passed, Americans' paychecks are a little bigger today,” he said. “Every business can write off the full cost of the new investments they make this year. These steps, taken by Democrats and Republicans, will grow the economy and add to the more than one million private sector jobs created last year.”
However, Obama cautioned that the tax cuts extension should not be made permanent for the wealthy in order to deal with the growing budget deficit. “And if we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans,” he said. “Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break. It's not a matter of punishing their success. It's about promoting America's success.”
However, Obama did call for making the tuition tax credit permanent. “To compete, higher education must be within reach of every American,” he said. “That's why we've ended the unwarranted taxpayer subsidies that went to banks, and used the savings to make college affordable for millions of students. And this year, I ask Congress to go further, and make permanent our tuition tax credit—worth $10,000 for four years of college."
He described the efforts he planned to rein in spending and tackle the budget deficit by freezing annual domestic spending over the next five years, making cuts in programs such as defense, and consolidating government agencies that deal with matters such as exports and housing policy. However, he also emphasized the need to invest more money in education, technology, infrastructure, transportation, and clean energy development to ensure U.S. competitiveness against other countries, likening it to the space race against the Soviet Union.
“This is our generation’s Sputnik moment,” he said.
Obama suggested the money for clean energy technology could come from rolling back tax breaks and other federal aid for the oil industry. "With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015," he said. "We need to get behind this innovation. And to help pay for it, I'm asking Congress to eliminate the billions in taxpayer dollars we currently give to oil companies. I don't know if you've noticed, but they're doing just fine on their own. So instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy, let's invest in tomorrow's."
He cited the work of the bipartisan deficit commission as a starting point for negotiations on how to control the budget deficit. "The bipartisan Fiscal Commission I created last year made this crystal clear," he said. "I don't agree with all their proposals, but they made important progress. And their conclusion is that the only way to tackle our deficit is to cut excessive spending wherever we find it – in domestic spending, defense spending, health care spending, and spending through tax breaks and loopholes."
Obama also called for Republicans and Democrats to work together to improve the health care reform law, but not to fight battles over repealing the law. He indicated his willingness to repeal the expanded 1099 reporting provisions, however. “Now, I've heard rumors that a few of you have some concerns about the new health care law,” he said. “So let me be the first to say that anything can be improved. If you have ideas about how to improve this law by making care better or more affordable, I am eager to work with you. We can start right now by correcting a flaw in the legislation that has placed an unnecessary bookkeeping burden on small businesses.”
In the official Republican response to Obama’s speech, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., emphasized the dangers of the growing budget deficit and the need to control spending. “Our nation is approaching a tipping point,” he warned. “We are at a moment where if government’s growth is left unchecked and unchallenged, America’s best century will be considered its past century.”
Another Republican lawmaker, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., delivered the first-ever Tea Party Caucus response to the State of the Union address after Ryan spoke, emphasizing the growth in the unemployment rate and the budget deficit after Obama took office. However, she agreed with the need to reduce corporate taxes. “We need to start making things again in this country, and we can do that by reducing the tax and regulatory burden on job-creators,” she said. “America will have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. Think about that. Look no further to see why jobs are moving overseas.”






5 Comments
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE #2 UPDATE
As a Certified Public Accountant, I and others in my field, have been inundated by incorrect Internal Revenue Service notices, ignored letters sent certified, and ignored fax information. The IRS has also accelerated the collections process during a period of instability due to new hires.
Sometimes notices from the IRS are signed by a particular agent and sometimes not. If we respond to an IRS letter that does not name an agent we have to write that response blindly.
I was shocked to learn from an IRS agent in Denver that any material faxed to them not designated to an agent is simply shred.
I have to wonder if they shred our letters, too.
Steve Green CPA
echoesofsteve@hotmail.com
Posted by: SteveGreenCPA | January 28, 2011 7:40 PM
Report this Comment
To Add to your comments its plain reality!!
Posted by: rosie11701 | January 27, 2011 1:50 PM
Report this Comment
To Steve Green and all:
Seems that there are secret organization within the IRS, one such is in Ben Salem, PA, where no one can be reached by telephone to handle a problem very simply without resorting to multitudes of long, repetitive correspondence at great expense to taxpayers, accountants and the IRS itself.
The question is, "Does anybody care, including the Commissioner himself." Given that he must know of the problems, if not he should resign as a no nothing, or if he does know but does nothing, he should be fired.
Posted by: Tedego | January 26, 2011 1:50 PM
Report this Comment
Maybe they can reform the IRS while they're at it:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
As a Certified Public Accountant since 1987, I have become alarmed about recent experiences with the Internal Revenue Service.
In fairness, I have seen times when they were inefficient or made errors but generally service was adequate. I have been advised that there are new hires in substantial numbers but it appears that they have a lack of training and are under a great deal of stress.
Here is an example of what I did today: I spent a good deal of time attempting to make logic of an IRS communication that made no sense whatsoever.
These are the errors:
1. It referred to the wrong income tax form;
2. It was nonspecific in nature and referred to a half dozen possible penalties that may have been assessed and none of these applied. In fact, had their letter been reviewed internally (which would be called "quality control"), it would have been obvious that there was no tax due on which to base a late payment penalty.
3. It referred to a previous notice which simply said that they received our correspondence and it would take time, perhaps 45 days, to respond. The new notice referred back to that notice and asked us to ignore it, as it had been sent in error. All right, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, it was incorrect only in the sense that it took much longer than 45 days to receive this second nonsensical letter.
4. And worst of all, it appeared that the contents of the original response I sent were perhaps not even read. We only received confirmation that they had received our letter, there was no evidence whatsoever that they read the content or understood it. So they continued to bill the original amount and added some interest to increase our frustration. Lastly, I have sent many responses, for many taxpayers due to the Internal Revenue Service errors and/or incompetence. In one case, a quarter - inch package was sent certified mail return receipt requested, and in fact we received confirmation of receipt; I had also faxed it and received confirmation of the fax. This was after responding to their first notice and they had only corrected one-half of their errors. The Service claimed they never received it.
The case was being handled by an individually named agent and all of my responses were directed to that agent.
If we give them the benefit of the doubt, they only managed to lose two identical packages sent to an individual. If we're cynical about it, perhaps they ended up in circular files due to the over-stressed and poorly trained employees. I am deeply hoping it is only the former but even in that case, the Internal Revenue Service's errors are so egregious as to be terribly frustrating, costly, and time consuming.
As many of these are small businesses and many taxpayers are having serious financial difficulties, I am forced to discount the charges so they can afford it. They are spending money that is going down the drain and both their production and mine are forced down. Guess what? In a depressed economy when production goes down, wealth goes down, tax revenues go down, and people end up in even more dire financial difficulties.
There are many things that are happening to our beloved United States that are disheartening and quite disturbing.
Very truly yours, Steven L. Green, CPA
The views expressed are solely those of Steven L. Green, CPA as an individual.They are not necessarily the views of any firms,clients, businesses, professional organizations or individuals that he may be associated with.
Steve Green, CPA graduated with a Bachelors Degree in Accounting from San Diego State University in 1984, served as an bookkeeper for a prominent former data processing Company based in San Diego, was licensed to practice as a Certified Public Accountant in California in 1987 and has been in public accounting since 1985.
Resume available upon request.
Steve Green CPA POB 712551 Santee CA 92072-2551
echoesofsteve@hotmail.com
Posted by: SteveGreenCPA | January 26, 2011 12:01 PM
Report this Comment
Rep. Paul Ryan is NOT from Wyo but should be R-WI for Wisconsin.
Posted by: FredKCPA | January 26, 2011 7:17 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.