Free Site Registration


Obama Plans Talks with Congress to Avoid Tax Increases and Fiscal Cliff

Washington, D.C. (November 9, 2012)

By Michael Cohn

President Barack Obama, fresh from his re-election, turned his attention Friday to the economy, offering to talk with Congress about how to avoid the prospect of automatic tax increases on the middle class.

However, Obama refused to give way on allowing taxpayers earning over $250,000 a year to avoid increases, while Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, insisted he would not permit tax increases on small business owners.

“As I said on Tuesday night, the American people voted for action, not politics as usual,” Obama said in a brief address at the White House Friday. “You elected us to focus on your jobs, not ours. And in that spirit, I’ve invited leaders of both parties to the White House next week, so we can start to build consensus around the challenges that we can only solve together. And I also intend to bring in business and labor and civic leaders from all across the country here to Washington to get their ideas and input as well.”

Obama said his economic plan involves rewarding small businesses and manufacturers that create jobs in the U.S., not overseas, and to give people the opportunity to get the education and training that businesses are looking for right now, as well as provide incentives for research and technology and clean energy. He also wants to put people back to work, including veterans, rebuilding roads, bridges, and other infrastructure, while reducing the budget deficit in a balanced, responsible way. 

“Our work is made that much more urgent because at the end of this year, we face a series of deadlines that require us to make major decisions about how to pay our deficit down —decisions that will have a huge impact on the economy and the middle class, both now and in the future,” he said. “Last year, I worked with Democrats and Republicans to cut a trillion dollars’ worth of spending that we just couldn’t afford.  I intend to work with both parties to do more, and that includes making reforms that will bring down the cost of health care so we can strengthen programs like Medicaid and Medicare for the long haul.”

Obama insisted, however, that reducing the deficit has to involve both spending cuts and tax revenue. “That means asking the wealthiest Americans to pay a little more in taxes,” he added. “That’s how we did it in the 1990s, when Bill Clinton was President. That’s how we can reduce the deficit while still making the investments we need to build a strong middle class and a strong economy. That’s the only way we can still afford to train our workers, or help our kids pay for college, or make sure that good jobs in clean energy or high-tech manufacturing don’t end up in countries like China.”

Obama said he has put forward a detailed plan that provides for reducing the budget deficit by $4 trillion over the next decade, while making critical investments. He emphasized that he is “not wedded to every detail” of his plan. 

“I’m open to compromise,” he said. “I’m open to new ideas. I’m committed to solving our fiscal challenges. But I refuse to accept any approach that isn’t balanced. I am not going to ask students and seniors and middle-class families to pay down the entire deficit while people like me, making over $250,000, aren’t asked to pay a dime more in taxes. I'm not going to do that.”

Obama noted that this was a central question during the election. “It was debated over and over again,” he said. “And on Tuesday night, we found out that the majority of Americans agree with my approach—and that includes Democrats, independents, and a lot of Republicans across the country, as well as independent economists and budget experts.  That’s how you reduce the deficit—with a balanced approach.”

He said his job now is to get a majority in Congress to reflect the will of the American people. “I believe we can get that majority,” he added. “I was encouraged to hear Speaker Boehner agree that tax revenue has to be part of this equation, so I look forward to hearing his ideas when I see him next week.”

Obama pointed out that if Congress fails to come to an agreement on an overall deficit reduction package by the end of the year, everybody’s taxes will automatically go up on January 1, including the 98 percent of Americans who make less than $250,000 a year. “That makes no sense,” he added. “It would be bad for the economy and would hit families that are already struggling to make ends meet.”

Obama urged Congress to decouple an extension of tax breaks for the middle class so it would not also depend on an extension of the tax cuts for those making over $250,000 a year.

“Now, fortunately, we shouldn’t need long negotiations or drama to solve that part of the problem,” he said. “While there may be disagreement in Congress over whether or not to raise taxes on folks making over $250,000 a year, nobody—not Republicans, not Democrats—want taxes to go up for folks making under $250,000 a year. So let’s not wait. Even as we’re negotiating a broader deficit reduction package, let’s extend the middle-class tax cuts right now.”

Obama stressed that one step would give millions of families—98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses—the certainty they need going into the New Year. “It would immediately take a huge chunk of the economic uncertainty off the table, and that will lead to new jobs and faster growth,” he added. “Business will know that consumers, they're not going to see a big tax increase. They'll know that most small businesses won't see a tax increase. And so a lot of the uncertainty that you're reading about, that will be removed.”

Obama noted that the Senate has already passed a bill to extend the tax cuts for the middle class, although he did not mention that the House has also passed a bill to extend the tax cuts for all income levels. “All we need is action from the House, and I’ve got the pen ready to sign the bill right away,” he said. “I'm ready to do it.”

Obama urged cooperation and noted that in the election, the American people indicated that they would not tolerate dysfunction in Washington. “They won’t tolerate politicians who view compromise as a dirty word,” he said. “Not when so many Americans are still out of work. Not when so many families and small business owners are still struggling to pay the bills. What the American people are looking for is cooperation. They're looking for consensus. They're looking for common sense. Most of all, they want action. I intend to deliver for them in my second term, and I expect to find willing partners in both parties to make that happen. So let’s get to work.”

In a separate press conference on Friday, Boehner noted that the Republican-dominated House has already passed legislation to prevent tax rates from rising and to avert the defense spending cuts that were part of the so-called “sequester.”

“The members of our majority understand how important it is to avert the fiscal cliff,” he said. “That’s why the House took action earlier this year to replace the ‘sequester’ with other types of cuts. And it’s also why over the summer we passed a bill to extend all the current tax rates for one year so that we had time to overhaul our Tax Code. And it is why I outlined a responsible path forward, where we can replace the spending cuts and extend the current rates, paving the way for entitlement reform as well as tax reform with lower tax rates.”

Boehner said he was open to discussing tax reform. “2013 should be the year we begin to solve our debt through tax reform and entitlement reform,” he said. “I'm proposing that we avert the fiscal cliff together in a manner that ensures that 2013 is finally the year that our government comes to grips with the major problems that are facing us. This will bring jobs home, result in a stronger, healthier economy. And a stronger, healthier economy means more Americans working and more revenues, which is what the President is seeking.”

Boehner suggested the talks would provide Obama with an opportunity to demonstrate leadership. “This framework can lead to common ground, and I hope the president will respond today in that same spirit,” he said. “As I said on Wednesday, this is an opportunity for the President to lead. This is his moment to engage the Congress and work towards a solution that can pass both chambers. Earlier this week, the President and I had a short conversation. It was cordial. I think we both understand that trying to find a way to avert the fiscal cliff is important for our country. And I’m hopeful that productive discussions can begin soon so that we can forge an agreement that can pass the Congress.”

Boehner also cited a newly released report from the Congressional Budget Office on the effects of going over the fiscal cliff, which highlights the contraction the U.S. economy would face in the wake of approximately $700 billion in expiring tax cuts and automatic spending reductions. According to the report, gross domestic product would drop 0.5 percent next year if the spending cuts and tax changes mandated by sequestration and the Budget Control Act were allowed to occur. The CBO also estimated that unemployment would increase to 9.1 percent from its current rate of 7.9 percent.

However, the report shows that if the fiscal cliff were eliminated without addressing current fiscal challenges, the economy would remain below its potential and unemployment would remain high. The CBO concluded that Congress should not eliminate the fiscal cliff without replacing it with a responsible, long-term deficit reduction plan.

For more information on the fiscal cliff and the expiring tax provisions, CCH is offering a new tax briefing on post-election tax policy.

6 Comments

Personally, reading this article made very clear to me that an "I" President is not going to do anything to encroach on the welfare of our country, only what "I" think is right, not the people of America. That approach is far too similar to that of the dinnerjacket Iranian and Hitler, the only difference is that the 47% on welfare or entitlemnt now think they are going to get free health insurance-do a poll and you will be surprised how many people believe this. Add the largest Tax increase in history and see what happens-rampant inflation. We are in for four years of pain and sufferring needlessly due to one person and a population of lazy people being handed whatever can be taken from anybody with a work ethic and a desire to succeed, since being a success is penalized, while being on the dole is cool. I'm just an old man trying to earn a living and am being told I cannot due to an obscure piece of a regulation never written by Congress, just put into place by one of the Czars. I have a college degree in 4 different subjects and cannot get a job or work at my chosen profession due the aforementioned regulations. My majors are Accounting, Math, Finance and Economics-no jobs for me? Did I choose the wrong course? Until this year I was succesful by any standard but that has all gone away with on "I" president who has never even had a job! Sorry for the rant, but this entire situation upsets me greatly.

Posted by: BRES | November 13, 2012 9:32 AM

Report this Comment


something needs to be done for the people on social security. they get a increase but it is taken away by the increase of medicare. so there is really not increase for these people to live on and with the cost of living going up. need to cut down on the earn income credit for most of these people only work up to making enougth to get the max.

Posted by: jean46 | November 13, 2012 9:15 AM

Report this Comment


What the government needs to do is eliminate all the loopholes and tax shelters for the wealthy so they can pay taxes according to their tax bracket; just like us middle class taxpayers who are caught in-between the rich and the poor. As for the poor, which is actually the lower middle class, eliminating the Earned Income Credit, will result in reducing fraudulent tax returns that account for millions of dollars lost every single year. Two ways to help us the working middle class is to make changes to tax law helping the wealthy and the lower middle class. Making 250,000 only allows a family to live comfortably. Less than 100,000; after all the deductions on a paycheck, its merely struggling with at least 40% going to insurance payments, such as health, life, home, vehicle, etc.

Posted by: Bertha | November 12, 2012 4:45 PM

Report this Comment


Divide and conquer, "raise taxes on those not paying their fair share" is the Obama mantra. First of all, it is a fact that there are not that many families making $250,000 or more. $250,000 is way to low an income level to absorb an extra tax burden. Raising taxes at that level in order to lower the rates for the majority is nothing more than government tax welfare. Perhaps millionaires like the Hollywood "stars" can stand more, but the rest of us are struggling.

Posted by: mcameron@ddccpa.com | November 12, 2012 3:39 PM

Report this Comment


The President and Congress is going to do what they always do because it is the easiest - tinker, massage and kick the can. As long as lenders continue to purchase treasuries and the Fed can monetize the rest of the deficit, there will be no substantive changes. least of all some "plan to reduce the deficit".

Posted by: colin@colincoopercpa.com | November 12, 2012 1:32 PM

Report this Comment


I contend that the Republican House will rowover and accept income tax increases in order to stop cuts on the defense budget. But I also, see the payroll tax decrease to disappear, which will affect all workers.

Posted by: altoneaston | November 12, 2012 10:23 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Jason Marx on the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Accountants

June 17, 2013

CCH Small Firm Services president Jason Marx talks about the challenges confronting small accounting firms, including regulatory and tax compliance, technology adoption, and do-it-yourself software.

Jennifer Warawa on the 'On-Demand' Accountant

June 14, 2013

Jennifer Warawa, VP of partner programs and channel sales at Sage, discusses how accountants need to communicate more frequently with clients so they become more of an "on-demand" resource.

George Farrah on the Challenges and Opportunities Facing Accountants

June 14, 2013

Bloomberg BNA executive editor of tax and accounting George Farrah discusses how accountants today are dealing with the economy, technology, globalization and practice management.

Amit Jain on Three Key Trends in Accounting

June 13, 2013

Amit Jain of ADP Small Business Services discusses how the accounting firm of tomorrow will be different from accounting firms today.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

20 Trends to Watch

June 16, 2013

New areas of change that accountants should be on the lookout for.

Protecting Clients from Tax-Related Identity Theft

May 31, 2013

Tax-related identity theft is a continuing problem, and a trustworthy tax preparer is an important part of the solution.

10 Simple Revenue Boosters to Start Now

May 28, 2013

Are your prospects choosing another accounting firm just because of price? There are ways to boost your image to earn a premium fee and leave low-price competitors behind.

Tax Season by the Numbers

May 22, 2013

The IRS recently released statistics covering the year to May 10, 2013.

Top 10 Tech Initiatives -- 2013

May 5, 2013

The AICPA's annual list of IT priorities for accounting firms.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement