Free Site Registration


Senate Democrats Introduce Legislation to Eliminate Corporate Tax ‘Loopholes’

Print
Email
Reprints
Washington, D.C. (February 12, 2013)

By Michael Cohn

(Page 1 of 2)

A pair of influential Senate Democrats have introduced a bill aimed at stopping multinational corporations from taking advantage of tax havens abroad.

Carl Levin

Senators Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., introduced the Cut Unjustified Tax Loopholes Act, also known as the CUT Loopholes Act, or S. 268, on Monday. The bill was introduced in the midst of a congressional and White House showdown over the impending budget sequestration and growing calls for corporate tax reform, but builds on earlier legislation introduced by Levin in previous congressional terms (see Senators Introduce Bill to Cut Tax Loopholes). This bill, which closes loopholes and strengthens enforcement measures against offshore tax haven abuse, could raise nearly $200 billion over 10 years, according to estimates.

Key provisions in the bill would ensure that companies, which are managed and controlled in the United States, are unable to claim foreign status in order to avoid taxes. The bill would also close loopholes that allow high-tech, pharmaceutical and other companies to license the patents for their products to sham shell companies in tax havens so they can book their profits there and avoid taxes. In addition, the CUT Loopholes Act would require full reporting from companies to determine if they’re booking profits to places where they are doing legitimate business, versus a P.O. Box tax haven subsidiary with no employees.

This loophole has come under particular scrutiny in recent days because Treasury Secretary nominee Jack Lew used to invest in a Citigroup hedge fund with a mailing address in a notorious office building known as Ugland House in the Cayman Islands that supposedly houses thousands of shell companies. Lew reportedly invested $56,000 in the Citigroup Venture Capital International Growth Partnership (Employee) II, L.P. hedge fund, but sold it at a loss for $54,418 in 2010 after he was confirmed as director of the Office of Management and Budget, according to NBC News.

The senators contend that large multinational corporations are making record profits while taking advantage of tax loopholes that helps them reduce their tax bills significantly. A study from the advocacy group, Citizens for Tax Justice, found that  30 Fortune 500 companies paid no federal income taxes in 2008-2010 while collectively earning almost $160 billion in profits.  Offshore tax abuses cost the U.S. Treasury an estimated $150 billion per year in lost revenues.

The bill would penalize offshore financial institutions and jurisdictions that impede U.S. tax enforcement; and defer tax deductions for U.S. corporations moving jobs and operations offshore until the corporation repatriates the offshore profits from those operations and pays taxes on them. It would also end transfer pricing abuses by taxing immediately excess income to foreign affiliates receiving U.S. intellectual property, limiting income shifting through U.S. property transfers offshore, and tightening the rules related to the valuation of “goodwill” and other intangibles.

The bill also aims to prevent corporations that renounce their U.S. residency despite their U.S. origins and operations from “earnings stripping” to avoid U.S. taxes. It would require foreign tax credits to be calculated on a pooled basis to stop the manipulation of those tax credits to dodge U.S. taxes. In addition, the bill would shift the burden of proof on establishing who controls an offshore entity; and stop corporations managed and controlled in the United States from claiming foreign status.

The bill would treat derivative payments made from the U.S. to offshore recipients as U.S. income; and end vanishing companies by stopping “check-the-box” for foreign entities and “CFC look-through” for controlled foreign corporations.

In addition, the bill would end a loophole that allows corporations to avoid paying taxes on repatriated income by treating it as a loan; and require multinationals to disclose their employees, revenues, and tax payments on a country-by-country basis.

“These loopholes are bad policy even in the best of circumstances, but it would be unconscionable to allow them to continue if we can use revenue from closing them to avoid the devastating effect sequestration would have on national security, homeland defense, law enforcement, public safety, education and other important priorities,” Levin said in a statement.

Other provisions would strengthen tax enforcement by tightening rules related to tax shelter promoters, stiffening penalties on aiders and abettors of tax evasion, and modernizing federal tax lien registration.

Another provision would end the carried interest tax break, ensuring that investment managers, such as hedge fund managers and venture capital firm partners, would pay ordinary income rates on all of their income from providing management services.

“It’s time to put an end to offshore tax abuses that allow powerful corporations to play ‘hide-the-pea’ tax games at the expense of honest taxpayers, and I’m proud to join Senator Levin in this effort,” said Whitehouse.

The bill also aims to ending excessive corporate tax deductions for stock options. Stock options are currently the only type of compensation where the federal tax code allows corporations to claim a bigger deduction on their tax returns than the corresponding expense on their corporate books. That approach enables profitable corporations to report higher earnings to shareholders, while using the stock option deduction to reduce or eliminate those earnings on their tax returns and pay little or no taxes. For example, Facebook booked stock options given to its founder at 6 cents per share, but was able to later claim a tax deduction at about $40 per share.

Corporations are also generally precluded from deducting compensation above $1 million paid to any employee. However, stock option compensation is exempt from that limit. Provisions in the bill would require corporations to take stock option tax deductions at the time, and in an amount not greater than, the stock option expenses shown on their books; and require that stock options compensation is subject to the same tax deductibility cap as other forms of compensation (at $1 million per executive).

Another provision would close a derivatives blended rate tax break. Since 1981, profits from certain derivatives—including commodity futures— have benefited from a more favorable “blended tax rate.” Specifically, a short-term capital gain from these derivatives is taxed, not at the short term capital gains rate, but at a rate which is 60 percent long term capital gains and 40 percent short term capital gains, even if the derivatives are held for seconds.

Normally, investments have to be held for at least 1 year to get preferential long term capital gains tax treatment. This blended rate loophole lowers the taxes on these derivatives by about 10 percent, which encourages commodity speculation (and high frequency trading) compared to investments in stocks, bonds, and other financial instruments subject to normal capital gains rules.

This provision has been supported by President Obama and is in line with a recent House Republican Ways and Means Committee draft, according to Levin’s office. This provision would end the blended rate for derivatives.

Another provision would end a tax break for tar sands oil spills. An IRS interpretation citing guidance from 1980 excludes oil produced from “tar sands” from having to contribute to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. The bill would update the law to reflect the commercial use of tar sands and other unconventional oils and ensure they help pay for oil spills.  The provision would require the tar sands oil industry to contribute to the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund.

The Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency, or FACT, coalition, which actively works on the issues of offshore tax haven abuse and anonymous corporations, supports S.268. “Offshore tax loopholes hurt domestic businesses, large and small, as well as individual taxpayers who must shoulder the extra tax burden through higher taxes and  and endure massive cuts to public services,” said Nicole Tichon, executive director of Tax Justice Network USA and a co-founder of the FACT Coalition.

Jubilee USA Network executive director Eric LeCompte said, “Every year, some of the most profitable corporations use a long list of loopholes to avoid paying taxes. With the sequester right around the corner, the CUT Loopholes Act will cut the loopholes and generate billions of dollars to avoid the next cliff.  Further, this legislation sends a global message that corporate tax dodging should not be tolerated in any corner of the world.”

5 Comments

Just more liberal drivel designed to promote and continue class warfare. Any of us with half a brain knows that if you raise taxes on the corporations, they will pass these increases on to us consumers in the form of higher prices. So we end up paying for those tax increases anyway. What's this Einstein's solution to that...forbid corporations to increase their prices?

Posted by: steviegcpa | February 13, 2013 11:48 AM

Report this Comment


Having watched the FATCA fiasco, those saving estimates they pulled out of thin air, I have to laugh when I see this "200 billion over 10 years, according to estimates."

Says who? And at what cost? Show me the methodology that went into this, as I have a very skeptical nose for these types of Government WAGs. Probably some 20 year old staffer working for Carl Levin as an intern came up with them, and now they will be repeated endlessly as gospel.

And.... I absolutely DO NOT believe anything coming out of Citizens for Tax Justice. "Offshore tax abuses cost the U.S. Treasury an estimated $150 billion per year in lost revenues."

and @Gordon, you are absolutely right.

I wonder how much Senator Carl Levin has given his contributing buddies in tax break loopholes in the past and how much that has cost the treasury? We don't like to talk about that, though, do we?

What about those sham shell companies in tax havens on the homeland shores, like Delaware and Wyoming! Guys like Carl are fixated offshore, when the BIGGEST TAX HAVEN IN THE WORLD is right on homeland US shores.

So, if this little beauty passes, how many pages of regulations do you think it will add to the Federal Register? FATCA was 544, but I bet this beats that!

Posted by: Just Me | February 13, 2013 12:06 AM

Report this Comment


As a retired former Manager and sometime Director of the Cayman Islands Chamber of Commerce, it is natural for me to defend our Islands' tax-haven facilities from undue criticism. I write a personal blog (Barlow's Cayman, available via Google) which contains several commentaries on Offshore tax-avoidance. "In defence of Offshore tax havens" (note the British spelling of "defence": we are a British colony, after all!), was posted in August 2012, during the US Presidential election. Readers can check it out in the blogsite archives.

Here is a brief extract. "Americans who resent Offshore tax-havens should ask themselves this: Who is it that composes the IRS code, and leaves the loopholes? The US Congress and its minions, that's who." It seems rather cheeky of Mr Levin and friends to grumble about US tax laws that they themselves must have helped pass into law. Just saying...

Posted by: Gordon Barlow | February 12, 2013 2:57 PM

Report this Comment


As per OldGoat, since SCOTUS declared Corporations to be people, they should now be taxed as people. SCOTUS ruled.

Posted by: tego@verizon.net | February 12, 2013 1:58 PM

Report this Comment


This all sounds good to me, and I also think that all foreign income should be taxed when earned, not when repatriated. After all, it's declared to stockholders as income! As an individual I had to pay income tax on all of my foreign earnings each and every year even though I did not bring any of the funds here for many years. I don't understand why corporations were ever allowed to not pay while individuals are required to do so.

Posted by: OldGoat | February 12, 2013 11:18 AM

Report this Comment

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

 

Follow Accounting Today
Advertisement
Advertisement

Women in Accounting: Where are the Leading Ladies?

May 17, 2013

Marcum’s Nanette Lee Miller and Janis Cowhey McDonagh sat down with managing editor Tamika Cody to discuss some of the obstacles women in the accounting profession face when trying to make their way into leadership positions.

IMA’s Jeff Thomson on the Role and Skills of Management Accountants

May 8, 2013

Institute of Management Accountants president and CEO Jeffrey Thomson discusses why accounting students should consider management accounting as a career, and the IMA's partnership with John Wiley & Sons.

Breaking out of Molds to Get Ahead

May 6, 2013

ConvergenceCoaching partner Jennifer Wilson talks with Accounting Today senior editor Danielle Lee about how female accountants can position themselves better for a promotion at their firms.

Advertisement

SLIDE SHOW

Top 10 Tech Initiatives -- 2013

May 5, 2013

The AICPA's annual list of IT priorities for accounting firms.

Tax Stats: May 2013

April 30, 2013

Our monthly collection of statistics from the world of tax.

10 Biggest Estate Planning Mistakes

April 29, 2013

Help your clients avoid these common pitfalls.

Common E-mail Security Mistakes

April 23, 2013

These five bad habits can make your confidential information -- and that of your clients -- easy to steal.

The Art of the Tax Cartoon

April 9, 2013

A selection of tax cartoons from Philly tax firm Drucker & Scaccetti's 'Finding Humor in Taxes' exhibit.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement