Senator Carl Levin, D-Mich., has proposed closing a tax loophole that would give Facebook an estimated $3 billion tax break on stock options for CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Carl Levin
Levin has been pushing to close a number of tax loopholes and deductions, particularly for multinational corporations (see Senator Introduces Bill to Cut Tax Loopholes). Under current law, he noted, Facebook can tell investors, regulators and the public that the stock options Zuckerberg received cost the company a mere 6 cents a share. But the company can also file a tax return claiming that those same options cost the company something close to what the shares actually sell for later on, perhaps $40 a share.
Levin pointed to President Obama’s recent tax reform proposals and the need for changes, particularly for corporations.
“One recent and very public announcement illustrates dramatically our Tax Code’s distortions and the need for reform,” Levin said in a speech Wednesday. “At the center of this story is Facebook and its founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. Mr. Zuckerberg and his company have become a remarkable American business success story. As part of that success, Facebook is in the process of making its initial public offering of stock. The public documents Facebook is required to file as part of that offering tell another compelling story, about one of our Tax Code’s unjustified corporate loopholes. According to its filings, when Facebook goes public, Mr. Zuckerberg plans to exercise options to purchase 120 million shares of stock for 6 cents a share. Mr. Zuckerberg’s shares, obviously, are going to be worth a great deal more than 6 cents, a total of about $7 million; they will apparently be worth more than 600 times as much, something in the neighborhood of $5 billion.”
Levin noted that while under current law, Facebook can tell investors and regulators that the stock options Zuckerberg received cost the company only 6 cents a share, and the company would record the expense that way on its books, the company can also legally later file a tax return claiming that those same options cost the company something close to what the shares actually sell for later on, perhaps $40 a share. The company can also take a tax deduction for that far larger amount.
“So the books show a highly profitable company—profitable, in part, because of the relatively small expense the company shows on its books for the stock options it grants to its employees,” said Levin. “But when it comes time to pay taxes, to pay Uncle Sam, the loophole in the Tax Code allows the company to take a tax deduction for a far larger expense than they show on their books.”
In addition, Levin noted, Facebook is allowed by law to carry back the so-called “loss” arising from this deduction for two years into the past, which means the company can claim a tax refund for the income tax that it has paid over the past two years, a refund that the company estimates at half a billion dollars. “So instead of paying taxes to the Treasury, this profitable company will claim a hefty refund on taxes already paid,” said Levin.
He noted that Facebook also says it will, as allowed by law, carry forward the “losses” arising from this tax deduction up to 20 years into the future, thereby reducing any tax it owes in the years ahead, giving Facebook a tax break of up to $3 billion.
“Now, the end result is that a profitable U.S. corporation—a success story—could end up paying no taxes at all for years, even decades,” said Levin. “I emphasize that Facebook’s actions are within the law. As with so much of our tax code, it’s not the law-breaking that shocks the conscience, it’s the stuff that’s perfectly legal.”
Levin noted that the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that he chairs has identified the stock option tax loophole for years and tried to explain its cost, unfairness, and why it should be closed. “The stock-option loophole allows corporations to compensate their executives with stock options, report a specific stock option expense to their shareholders, and then later take a tax deduction for typically a much higher amount,” he said. “Stock options grants are the only kind of compensation where the Tax Code allows companies to claim a higher expense for tax purposes than is shown on their books. Our subcommittee found that the difference between what U.S. corporations tell the public and what they told the IRS was as much $61 billion in one year. Facebook’s use of this loophole is the most pointed illustration yet of the cost of this loophole.”











6 Comments
me14600, Zuckerburg doesn't pay $5 billion in cap gains, he pays .15% on $5 billion, which is about $750 Million he will owe in taxes.
Posted by: Brownj12 | March 7, 2012 1:47 PM
Report this Comment
These appear to be non-qualified stock options. If this is the case the character of the income will be W-2 and as such the recipient, Mark Z, will have ordinary income and the Company will be able to expense the amount amount. Thus there is income and there is expense. How is this a "loophole"?
Levin is such levity to me if he does not understand the mechanics of reporting non-quals and cries foul simply because the company deduct the difference between the grant and excercise price of the option. Does he not understand that W-2 income is realized by the recipient? Not long-term cap gain...but rather W-2. Just forgot to mention that little detail??
Posted by: shaggyCPA | March 3, 2012 7:33 AM
Report this Comment
Great suggestion mel4600, but it would not go anywhere while the "Chosen One" is sitting in the White House. Warren Buffet is his lackey, Solyndra is his pet project and some of the executives are his political bundlers and GM is controlled by his ardent union supporters.
Posted by: Linor34b | March 2, 2012 4:21 PM
Report this Comment
Let's see, so now would this take the tax code up over 73,000 pages now. That really makes things better for us all. More complexity!! Geeze.
Has one man ever done more harm than Carl Levin in search of good intentions with his constant tweaking of the Tax Code with out any knowledge of the unintended consequences of his action. It all sounds good until months later and we discover that...oh, didn't know that would happen.
If FATCA is the example of the last great good he has done, then who know what will happen with this one! This guy is a clear and present danger to the fiscal health of the country. Time to retire Carl.
Let's do something to simplify this entire Tax Code and remove manipulation by Congress. Get something fairer, simpler, flatter and do away with the ability of Congress to keep mucking it up.
I have come to the conclusion that the only way to restrain them is with a Constitutional amendment.
Posted by: Just Me | March 2, 2012 12:12 PM
Report this Comment
I agree with mel4600 that the individuals receiving the options will have to pay capital gains based on the grant price. However, I also believe that the Senator has hit on something that inherently seems wrong. The company expense should equal the basis that is assigned to the individual option owners. If I am giving you something that I determine has a value of $.06 then my tax expense should be the $.06 not some inflated value. Conversely if the "true" expense based on reasonable analysis is determined to be much higher than the basis assigned to the options should equate to that value.
Posted by: TJ.Walsh@hotmail.com | March 2, 2012 9:59 AM
Report this Comment
The article forgot to mention the $5 Billion capital gain Zuckerberg will have to pay when and if he sells his stock. This is no different than what Chrysler did with Lee Iococca for his salary when he saved Chrysler. The Democrats should be more concerned about the taxes Warren Buffett is fighting not to pay when he preaches he does not owe enough, or the Golden parachutes the Solyndra execurtives are getting in addition to rippiing off the taxpayers. I would also be more concerned about the money GM owes us and when we expect to get paid back.
Posted by: mel4600 | March 2, 2012 7:30 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.