A bipartisan trio of senators has introduced legislation that would foster the growth of S corporations owned by Employee Stock Ownership Plans, or S-ESOPs.

Olympia Snowe
The bill, sponsored by Senators Ben Cardin, D-Md., Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, is known as the Promotion and Expansion of Private Employee Ownership Act of 2011, or S. 1512. Similar legislation in the House was introduced earlier this year and so far has been endorsed by 18 Republicans and 18 Democrats.
The bill aims to eliminate the barriers faced by businesses and their owners when establishing a new S corporation ESOP or expanding the employee ownership stake in an S corporation.
Advertisement
“S-ESOPs have proven resilient even in tough times—hiring new workers as other firms were shrinking—while also providing an effective means of retirement savings for their workers,” Cardin said in a statement Wednesday. “We need to preserve and expand this structure to enable more businesses to grow and to allow their employees to accrue these valuable benefits. Americans deserve the opportunity to build secure retirement savings; far too many hard-working individuals are left with serious questions about their future economic security.”
The bill would permit owners of S corporation stock to sell the stock to an ESOP and defer the capital gains tax if the proceeds are reinvested in the equities of U.S. operating corporations, as owners of C corporations stock have been able to do under Section 1042 of the Tax Code since 1984. It would also establish an office in the Treasury Department to provide technical assistance to S corporations with ESOPs.
The bill would also provide protection for small businesses by ensuring that they would continue to qualify for the Small Business Administration’s loan, contracting assistance, or business development programs after they have converted to ESOPs. The technical change in the law would allow a business to maintain its status as minority-owned, woman-owned, veteran-owned, or otherwise qualify for specific programs within the SBA that are dependent on the nature of the ownership, if the company becomes owned 50 percent or more by an ESOP, and the workforce remains the same or nearly the same as before the establishment of the 50 percent ownership by employees through the ESOP.
“These types of positive incentives are an incredible motivator of employees, and in the face of looming tax reform, it is important for Congress to change these provisions now so they are not forgotten in larger tax reform or, worse, changed in some other, less favorable way,” said Snowe. “Implementing these reforms now will also afford small businesses and their employees a degree of certainty regarding their financial futures in what has been an extremely tumultuous economic environment.”






3 Comments
There seems to be a perception by some folks that we have a zero sum game and if Peter gets the prize then it has to come from Paul. When government steps back and allows private industry to expand and grow and prosper then we all benenfit and the Fed will ultimately get more in the way of taxes because the economy has expanded and the base has increased. This is the way to create jobs and incentives and opportunity.
Posted by: bob from elgin | September 8, 2011 9:00 PM
Report this Comment
ESOP companies, especially S corporations with ESOPs, tend to be smaller companies and they tend to make generous contributions to their employee benefits plans. My organization, the National Center for Employee Ownership, is not an advocacy group -- we are dedicated to providing accurate, reliable information on employee ownership. Based on an analysis of Department of Labor data, we wrote in the BNA publication Pension & Benefits: "Even using extremely conservative estimates, ESOP participants have more plans, more assets in company-sponsored plans, and use less of their own assets." The first comment is incorrect in its assessment of the tax impact of S corporation ESOPs. Steve Freeman and Michael Knoll at UPenn studied S corporation ESOPs and found a net benefit to the federal treasury, the result of increased productivity.
Posted by: lorenrodgers | September 8, 2011 7:55 PM
Report this Comment
Clearly their donor-friends are from Wall Street, not Main Street. Why grease-treat S-Corps any easier than they already are and then grant them add-on BONUS favors as though they had paid the price of being a C-Corp. If an S-Corp is tired of its tax advantages and wants an advantage of a C-Corp, it can become a Big-Boy C-Corp. Stop picking our public pocket to fill your buddies' pockets. Coming soon: Indiana Jones & the US Treasury Robber-Barons.
Posted by: EnrolledAgent | September 8, 2011 12:21 PM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.