Clarifying Form 1099-R would help the Internal Revenue Service identify more taxpayers who are underreporting their retirement income, according to a new report.

J. Russell George
The report, from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, noted that in a tax gap study for tax year 2001, the IRS estimated that as much as $4.2 billion could be attributed to underreported retirement income. Given the magnitude of underreporting, even small improvements in the IRS’s examination of tax returns with retirement income could increase taxpayer compliance and generate substantial revenue to the federal government to reduce the tax gap between taxes owed and money actually collected.
TIGTA conducted its review to determine whether the IRS has effective controls and processes in place to ensure that taxpayers and retirement income providers are correctly computing and reporting the taxable portion of retirement income.
Advertisement
TIGTA looked at the IRS’s Automated Underreporter Program, a compliance program, and found that it is effectively determining the proper reporting of retirement income when Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., discloses the taxable amount of the retirement distribution. For example, for tax year 2007, AUR Program examiners made tax assessments totaling approximately $607.5 million on 217,811 tax returns. However, it found that additional tax form information, if available, would improve compliance even more.
TIGTA recommended that the commissioner of the IRS’s Wage and Investment Division revise the Form 1099-R to clarify the meaning of the “taxable amount not determined” box in order to reduce taxpayer confusion and include the dates needed to identify retirement savings program distributions and transfers not rolled over within 60 days as required. The IRS should also establish procedures to transcribe additional lines from various tax forms, suggested the report.
“Our report found that correctly reporting taxable amounts of retirement distributions on Form 1099-R can be confusing for taxpayers,” said TIGTA Inspector General J. Russell George in a statement. “By implementing TIGTA’s recommendation to clarify the form, the IRS can reduce taxpayer confusion and improve compliance.”
The IRS substantially agreed with TIGTA’s recommendations and plans to revise the instructions to Form 1099-R to clarify taxpayer responsibilities and the amounts to report. The IRS also intends to consider the feasibility and benefits of including the dates of distributions and their respective contributions to identify distributions not rolled over within 60 days. However, TIGTA maintains that this information would be useful to the AUR Program when taxpayers do not utilize direct transfers between financial institutions.
The IRS plans to conduct its own study to determine the benefit of transcribing additional lines from tax forms. TIGTA maintains that the cost to transcribe the forms would be nominal and would not increase taxpayer burden.
The IRS also had other objections. “We will explore your recommendations, but based on our experience from working with retirement professionals and financial institutions, we question whether required reporting of distribution and rollover contribution dates will lead to significant improvements in the deterrence or detection of unreported retirement income,” wrote Richard Byrd, Jr., the commissioner of the IRS’s Wage and Investment Division. “As noted in the report, an individual receiving certain types of distributions from retirement plans or Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) may have the option of transferring the distribution amount to another qualified plan or IRA. When individuals receive rollover-eligible distributions from the retirement plan or IRA, rather than having the funds transferred directly between the plan administrators and/or trustees, they must deposit the funds into a qualified plan or IRA within 60 days from the distribution date. Failure to deposit the funds can subject the distribution to taxation as regular income and an additional ten percent tax.”






4 Comments
Having just done my boyfriend's eldery parents taxes the other day, I ran into this very situation. It was extremly confusing and, if I didn't work as a receptionist with a major tax prep company I would have WRONGLY assumed that there was no income to report. Using one of the popular on-line tax prep sites the only offer that was made to figure it out was to complete some confusing IRS worksheet. Asking one of the tax pros I work with is what prevented me from making a $300 mistake on their return. The form needs to be clearer. If I had no experience with taxes I would have made an incorrect assumtion; being that I do deal with taxes remotely a few months a year I at least had the wearwithall (sp?) to ask the question. I agree tazman1963.
Posted by: lii-lii | February 16, 2012 9:57 AM
Report this Comment
To tazman: How is the paying entity to know if the recipient intends to, and has rolled over what portion of the amount paid?
If you as a tazman don't ask, why are you preparing taxes at all?
Posted by: tego@verizon.net | February 8, 2012 11:16 PM
Report this Comment
Wait a minute. If this report states 4.2 billion of the tax gap can be attributable to underreporting of retirement income.(2001)
Then two weeks ago an article stated a portion of the tax gap - 3.62 billion is attributable to government employees not paying their taxes! -see Jan 30th article
So this means the entire issue is almost equal to the back taxes are owed by our federal employees!!!!
Let's not bring up issues that are equal in treatment - go after 4.2 but let's let 3.6 slide.
Again - should be a manatory payroll deduction if they are going to make manatory regulations to collect almost the same amount of $$$
Posted by: Lenore | February 8, 2012 4:15 PM
Report this Comment
WHEN YOU HAVE "TAXABLE AMOUNT NOT DETERMINED" CHECKED AND THERE IS AN AMOUNT ON THE TAXABLE LINE , IT TELLS ME THAT THE PERSON FILLING IT OUT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE FORM AT ALL. ANOTHER BEEF IS WHEN THE TAXABLE AMOUNT IT IS NOT DETERMINED THE RETIREMENT ENTITY SHOULD BE FORCED TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT AND NOT LEAVE IT TO THE TAX ACCOUNTANT. PUT IT ALL ON ONE FORM. THEN EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO. JEFF
Posted by: tazman1963 | February 8, 2012 10:36 AM
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Accounting Today, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment.