[IMGCAP(1)]Did you hear that a bunch of seventh graders recently discovered a cave on Mars? They were participating in the Mars Student Imaging Program at the Mars Space Flight Facility at Arizona State University. These kids are 12 years old. Recently, I took my kids to see Shrek 4: Forever After.
As Einstein once said, most human beings only use about 10 percent of their brains. Thats me.
And thats true for my business too. Particularly in the case of Microsoft Office. Like many of my clients, we feel like were only using 10 percent of the functionality of this product. So now that the new version of Office is out, Ive been thinking some deep thoughts. Are there really caves on Mars? Will Eddie Murphy ever make a funny movie again? And, just as important, is it worth upgrading to Office 2010? Or, given the options available today, should we just replace it altogether?
Think, brain, think!
Even though Microsoft lowered the price of Office 2010, it still costs. Granted, Im a Microsoft Partner (although we dont sell the Office products). But for the full version of the product, which includes Access and Publisher, the price for small business owners like me is $349 per license. Unfortunately, theres no upgrade pricing so we get no benefit from already owning the software. I havent discovered any caves on Mars recently, but I did figure out that the cost of upgrading my 10-person company would be about $3,500. This compares to $50/year/user for Google Apps or Zoho Business, two leading hosted office products for small companies like mine. Even if I dont want to go for a hosted solution, I can download the open sourced Open Office, powered by Oracle, and run it for free.
Yes, I admit that I wasted $60 on Shrek 4. And I admit that I struggle to use even 10 percent of the brainpower God gave me. But does this mean that I should shell out $3,500 for an office application when I can get a competing product for a lot less? What would those Mars kids do?
For starters, my company is an advanced user of Microsoft Office. Sure, you can argue, but many of my people swear by Outlook and consider it to be the best e-mail application around. People like to stick with things that work. We upgrade the applications that we find useful, particularly if we can enjoy new features and faster performance. Outlook 2010 has these. You can read the detailed reviews elsewhere.
In addition to Outlook, we have many databases built in Microsoft Access, including the accounting system we use. Many of my clients have built complex macros in Word for mail merging. Others have pivot table-based spreadsheets in Excel for internal analysis. A few business owners I know are heavy users of Microsoft Project and SharePoint. Im not saying that changing office applications would be an impossible task. But it would be a headache for many of us and could even possibly push us back a few steps if a new application doesnt come with the same advanced features that we need to run our businesses.
Things would be different if my company were just a startup. If the slate were clean and we hadnt chosen an office tool, then avoiding the $349 per user price and going with a hosted application like the ones above, or Peepel, Feng Office or ThinkFree, would make a lot of sense. These applications are either free or cost next to nothing and provide most of the basic functionality that a small company like mine needs. And many startup companies today are launched from the owners home or involve users in different geographic locations. These people are used to using remote connection tools. So a web-based office suite thats quickly accessible by everyone who wants to collaborate also makes a lot of sense. Sure, Microsoft has its Live service, but its still not as simple as the newer web-based applications already available.
Another thing about collaboration and remote workers: its tougher to do with Microsoft Office.
Google and Zoho offer online group calendaring right from the start. ThinkFree gives their users fast document management using any phone, even if its (gasp!) not a Windows Mobile device. Plaxo keeps contacts in the cloud for everyone in the company to access. Although not required, Microsoft really, really wants you to deploy your group calendaring and e-mail through Exchange (another cost). You need third-party products to synchronize documents to mobile devices like the Android or iPhone. Todays online office suites were built with the mobile and remote user in mind. Microsoft Office wasnt.
Its still playing catch-up.
Even with all these great advantages, many of the new applications are missing a couple of things that established small businesses owners like me desperately seek (besides peace and quiet).
Like support. There are thousands of Microsoft Certified Professionals worldwide. True, most of them look like Zach Galifianakis in The Hangover, but they do know their computers. They support Microsoft Office. They troubleshoot problems, by phone, online or (if youre brave enough) at your offices. They create customized applications and integrate these products with others. They have at their disposal thousands of templates created by other creepy Microsoft developers over the years. Many of the newer applications that compete with Microsoft Office dont have the support resources available. And when youve got a problem with a critical office application, you want support.
And integration too.
Office has been around for a zillion years. Established software developers are used to working with it. Because it doesnt sit somewhere in the cloud, it has been integrated with many of the applications small companies use, like ACT, GoldMine, QuickBooks, Peachtree and hundreds of other vertical accounting and management systems. Adobe's Buzzword may be a cool (and free) online word processor, but it doesnt integrate as well (or in most cases at all) with these popular business applications. And neither does Peepel or Feng Office or ThinkFree. Thats not to say that many of these apps, particularly the open source ones, cant be modified to integrate with most small business programs. But they generally are not integrated out of the box and would require hiring one of those programming guys. I hate those guys.
So for my company, Im going to stick with Office.
Why? Because Im lazy and I only use 10 percent of my brain. But its also because I dont want to distract my employees and turn my company upside down with a whole new system. Look, Im not going to be discovering any caves on Mars. And I may have a tough time explaining this decision to a 25-year-old starting up his own company.
Ill just keep sticking with what I know.
Hey anyone see Toy Story 3?
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Accounting Today content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access