NATIONAL SALES TAXES HIT RECORD LEVELS IN 2003: The sales tax rates levied by states, counties, cities and districts reached all-time highs in 2003, resulting in the largest overall increase in more than a decade, according to a report by tax technology company Vertex Inc.
According to the report, municipalities raised 412 rates and created 476 new sales and use taxes, while lowering only 66 rates.
“State and local jurisdictions that are grappling with budget deficits and a struggling economy are adding sales taxes or increasing their rates to recoup lost revenue,” said Diana DiBello, Vertex’s director of tax, who was responsible for overseeing the 2003 sales tax rate report.
The combined average tax rate, which adds the average rates imposed by states, counties and cities/districts, rose to 8.534 percent in 2003, the biggest single-year increase since 1992. During the past two years, the combined average tax rate has risen by 26 percent, which is nearly as much as it went up during the previous nine years. The average combined tax rate increased 29 percent between 1992 and 2001.
The number of sales tax changes increased from 735 in 2002 to 954 in 2003, the highest number of changes in a single year since Vertex began tracking the data in 1981. However, more than half of the new sales and use taxes came from Kansas, which changed the taxable point of a sale from where goods are sold to where they are delivered.
Approximately 8,019 state, county and city jurisdictions in the U.S. charge a sales tax, notes the report, which also shows that the combined average sales tax has risen every year except 1999.
TREASURY, IRS SHUTTER ABUSIVE RETIREMENT PLANS: The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have issued guidance in the form of a revenue procedure, two revenue rulings, and proposed regulations in order to shut down abusive transactions involving specially designed life insurance policies in retirement plans, Section 412(i) plans.
The guidance designates certain arrangements as “listed transactions” for tax-shelter reporting purposes.
A Section 412(i) plan is a tax-qualified retirement plan that is funded entirely by a life insurance contract or an annuity. The employer claims tax deductions for contributions that are used by the plan to pay premiums on an insurance contract covering an employee.
The plan may hold the contract until the employee dies, or it may distribute or sell the contract to the employee at a specific point, such as when the employee retires.
“The guidance targets specific abuses occurring with Section 412(i) plans,” said assistant secretary for tax policy Pam Olson. “There are many legitimate Section 412(i) plans, but some push the envelope, claiming tax results for employees and employers that do not reflect the underlying economics of the arrangements.”
“Again and again, we’ve uncovered abusive tax avoidance transactions that game the system to the detriment of those who play by the rules,” said IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson. “This action sends a strong signal to those taking advantage of certain insurance policies that these abusive schemes must stop.”
The guidance covers three specific issues. First, a set of proposed regulations states that any life insurance contract transferred from an employer or a tax-qualified plan to an employee must be taxed at its full fair-market value. These regulations, which will be effective for transfers made on or after Feb. 13, 2004, would prevent taxpayers from using artificial devices to understate the value of the contract. A revenue procedure issued along with the proposed regulations provides a temporary safe harbor for determining fair-market value.
Second, a new revenue ruling states that an employer cannot buy excessive life insurance (i.e., insurance contracts where the death benefits exceed the death benefits provided to the employee’s beneficiaries under the terms of the plan, with the balance of the proceeds reverting to the plan as a return on investment) in order to claim large tax deductions. These arrangements generally will be listed transactions for tax shelter reporting purposes.
Third, another new revenue ruling states that a Section 412(i) plan cannot use differences in life insurance contracts to discriminate in favor of highly paid employees.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Accounting Today content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access