The Institute of Management Accountants is again rolling out its "Statements on Management Accounting."

After months of increasing reports of investigations by both the Securities and Exchange Commission and academics, Congress is now examining the sometimes-questionable timing of stock options granted to executives.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice have formally supported the constitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board with the filing of a 46-page legal brief just before Labor Day.

More than 900 companies have used accelerated vesting schedules to avoid an estimated $8 billion in costs, according to a Bear Stearns report issued last week.

A study sponsored by the Institute of Management Accountants indicated that some of the problems with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act might stem from a professional bias that emphasizes public accountancy over management accounting.IMA president and chief executive Paul Sharman said that the public, professional and governmental assumption that public accountancy is the only accountancy has resulted in regulation that cannot be implemented, and the use of an auditing standard as an accounting standard.

Schedule M-3 is part of the effort by the Internal Revenue Service to get a better handle on abusive tax shelters and other aggressive tax techniques by getting sufficient detail on book/tax differences that it can guide IRS auditors to transactions in need of further examination.The IRS is sufficiently confident in its ability to track book/tax differences on Schedule M-3 that earlier this year it removed book/tax differences as a criteria required for reportable transactions. While the former Schedule M-1 required only 10 lines of information, Schedule M-3 expands that to 90 lines of information, with an emphasis on making a distinction between temporary and permanent book/tax differences.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board recently issued its inaugural audit practice alert, warning auditors to be on the watch for problems with the timing of, and the accounting for, stock-option grants."Auditors planning or performing an audit should be alert to the risk that the issuer may not have properly accounted for stock-option grants and ... may have materially misstated its financial statements," the alert said, alluding to recent investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Internal Revenue Service into whether companies routinely backdate, spring-load or otherwise manipulate stock-options grants to top executives.