Audit

The Securities and Exchange Commission is looking at an early March timetable in which to offer companies guidance on stock option expensing. According to The Wall Street Journal, SEC chief accountant Don Nicolaisen said that the regulator is close to making a decision on how much leeway to grant companies in applying the options-expensing standards. "But in early March, we'd like to be in a position to at least express key views on what our thinking is," Nicolaisen said. The protracted battle to expense options has come under intense lobbying pressure from pro-options groups, the high-tech sector and lawmakers with large constituencies affected by the options rule issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Last year, the House, led by Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., overwhelmingly passed its own version of options expensing that requires that options be expensed only for a company's top five executives. Last fall, some 50 senators requested that the SEC delay implementing the rule until the regulator could provide valuation guidance.

While agreeing in essence with President Bush's plan to privatize Social Security, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said that change to the 70-year-old program must come gradually. "If you're going to move to private accounts, which I approve of, I think you have to do it in a cautious, gradual way," Greenspan said in remarks before the Senate Banking Committee. Greenspan concurred with the assessment that the problems with Social Security should be addressed sooner rather than later. including the possibility of raising payroll taxes to help offset transition costs. "Beyond the near term, benefits promised to a burgeoning retirement-age population under mandatory entitlement programs, most notably Social Security and Medicare, threaten to strain the resources of the working-age population in the years ahead," Greenspan said. "Real progress on these issues will unavoidably entail many difficult choices. But the demographics are inexorable, and call for action before the leading edge of Baby Boomer retirement becomes evident in 2008." The chairman also said that the economy is sound, with inflation in check, and indicated that the Fed would continue raising short-term interest rates. But he advised that it is ""imperative to restore fiscal discipline," referring to the record budget deficit.

Regulators at the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board are wrestling with proposals to abandon the current "pass-fail" auditor reporting model for informing investors of the accuracy of corporate financial statements -- a move that could require independent accountants to provide considerably more information about the veracity of their clients' financial reports. But critics of the plan for requiring auditors to provide a more detailed discussion of their views of corporate financial statements are warning the PCAOB that such a shift in auditor reporting standards would create more confusion than enlightenment for most investors. Under the current ground rules, auditor reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission must include unqualified opinions "stating that the company's financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the entity in conforming with GAAP." Some members of the PCAOB's Standing Advisory Group however, have warned the board that this approach effectively establishes a pass/fail system under which investors are provided with no information to distinguish between companies with borderline financial statements and those with highly accurate statements. "The problem with the current (pass-fail) model is that if you have a company that is trying to push the line as far as they can get away with, the auditor's report would provide that company with essentially the same rating as one that does an excellent job of providing high quality financial information," Consumer Federation of America Investor Protection Director Barbara Roper told the PCAOB. At the Feb. 16 SAG meeting, Roper argued that a change in the auditor reporting model to allow accountants "to provide more insight into the audit report" would make it more difficult for companies to do the bare minimum to achieve a GAAP "passing" grade. Other SAG members disagreed, warning that providing anything more that the auditor's pass-or-fail rating might confuse investors. "The investing public should be able to read a financial statement and pretty much get out of it what's good and what's bad," Dallas CPA Wanda Lorenz told the board. Providing more detailed - but potentially more ambiguous -- information about the auditor's opinion may not be helpful to the average investor, she maintained. Those views were echoed by SAG member Lynn Turner, managing director at proxy researcher Glass-Lewis, who told the board that "because of the level of sophistication of the average investor, you have to keep in simple." In voicing concerns about a shift to more detailed auditor disclosures, Turner - a former Securities and Exchange Commission Chief Accountant - urged the PCAOB to be sensitive to the needs of investors who already find financial reports difficult to understand. "You have to keep it simple," he said. "You have to tell them whether the numbers are right or not right...in simple language."

High-profile Texas investor and entrepreneur Sam Wyly has filed an $80 million suit against Big Four firm Ernst & Young, charging that the firm's audits of troubled Computer Associates influenced his decision to sell his company, Sterling Software, to CA in a stock transaction. According to published reports, Wyly's suit, which was filed in Texas District Court here, said that he relied on E&Y audits for CA's fiscal 1999 to sell his company to the concern for stock. Roughly one month later CA's shares plunged some 12 percent when its earnings reports were delayed, and then fell further when the company failed to make its earnings forecast. Computer Associates replaced E&Y in 1999 with Big Four rival KPMG. "We believe the case is without merit," said an E&Y spokesman. Computer Associates ultimately became mired in a $2.2 billion accounting fraud, a scandal that led to the ouster of several members of its top management, including chief executive Sanjay Kumar. The company had been backdating purchase orders and keeping the books open past the period close. Recently, the company named former Dell executive Robert W. Davis as executive vice president and chief financial officer, replacing Ira Zar, who last year plead guilty to securities fraud. Last week, interim chief executive Kenneth D. Cron, who was picked to replace Kumar, stepped down, and president and CEO-elect, John Swainson assumed the reigns of the Islandia, N.Y.-based company. The suit marks the latest go-round for Wyly in his battles with CA and related parties. Four years ago, he led a proxy battle to unseat management, and later filed another suit in an attempt to have management return their bonuses.

A survey of 220 businesses revealed that while compliance costs associated with SOX Sections 404 and 302 are front-loaded, once companies are through the process, there is a great deal of proportional value. The poll, conducted jointly by International Data Corp. and RevenueRecognition.com, also noted that a compliance "chasm" exists and that companies that have crossed it have achieved more effective results at less cost. IDC asked respondents to rate the cost of six major Sarbanes-Oxley compliance tasks, and also to judge the effectiveness of those tasks for improving risk management. The cost and effectiveness ratings were roughly even for activities such as documenting accounting policies, certification and sign off on internal controls, certification of financial statements, and responding to external audit attestation processes. However, the cost of documenting internal controls was rated substantially higher than its effectiveness for improving risk management, and the cost of repairing any weaknesses was rated substantially lower than its effectiveness for improving risk management. The survey focused on costs for internal resources and outside consulting from both Big Four and non-Big Four audit firms. The resource requirements to support SOX increased in direct proportion to the size of organization based upon revenue. For public enterprises with more than $1 billion in revenue, the average amount of labor spent on compliance activities was more than 12 person-years. Companies in the $200 million to $1 billion revenue range averaged more than six-and-a-half person-years of effort. Furthermore, the cost of external auditing services increased 52 percent for public companies. Midsized companies with $200 million to $1 billion in revenue reported an 81 percent average increase.

As part of the 91 inspections of smaller audit firms performed over the course of 2004, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board identified "significant" deficiencies in two of the firms, one finding of which was significant enough to question the firm's audit opinion. According to BNA, the two firms were identified as Dudley, Hopton-Jones, Sims & Freeman, of Birmingham, Ala., which had one Securities and Exchange Commission issuer client at time of the inspection, and Clyde Bailey PC, a sole practitioner in San Antonio with 17 publicly traded clients. With regard to Dudley Hopton-Jones, the oversight body unearthed deficiencies such as inadequate testing of the client's self-insurance reserve, and called into question the firm's audit opinion. The board's report on Clyde Bailey revealed a host of problems, including "inappropriate farming out of substantially all" audit work to another auditor and a number of departures from generally accepted accounting principles. Meanwhile, Dayton, Ohio-based Battelle & Battelle, with four public clients, received a clean audit inspection but did not get a sign-off on its quality control system. The PCAOB will make the quality controls findings public after one year should the firm fail to address them. The firms receiving clean inspection reviews were: Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, in Denver; Moore Stephens Frost, of Little Rock, Ark.; Ramirez International Financial & Accounting Services, in Irvine, Calif.; Richard Browne & Co., of Tampa, Fla.; and Saslow Lufkin & Buggy, in Avon, Conn.

AeA, a large trade association to the high technology sector, said that the impacts of the Section 404 requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley is "devastating" to small and midsized companies, and estimates its true implementation costs at $35 billion, compared to Congress' initial projection of $1.25 billion. In a report titled 'Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404: The 'Section' of Unintended Consequences and its Impact on Small Business,' the group makes a series of recommendations to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and Congress, including suspending the 404 mandate for companies with annual revenues of under $1 billion and a proposal to allow companies to annually rotate the internal controls that are scheduled to be tested. "This is the quintessential example of the law of unintended consequences, and Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley is not meeting its objectives. It has been an unnecessary burden for small- and medium-sized companies throughout the United States, and while Section 404 is well intentioned, the tremendous increase in cost to smaller companies is out of control," said William T. Archey, president and chief executive of AeA. Alex Davern, chairman of AeA's Sarbanes-Oxley Advisory Committee and chief financial officer at National Instruments Corp., said, "Smaller companies neither require, nor can they afford, the same level of investment in internal controls as larger companies. Implementation of Section 404 needs to be reevaluated and modified to prevent permanent damage to the small- and medium-sized businesses that are the job growth engine of the U.S. economy." A copy of the report can be found at http://www.aea

A startling 90 percent of Americans are worried about their retirement savings, even prior to President Bush unveiling his sweeping second-term agenda, which includes a series of reform measures topped by revamping the Social Security system. Some 57 percent of consumers participating in a survey by banking and financial services conglomerate Wachovia Corp. said that they often worried or sometimes felt worried about how well they will be prepared for retirement, while 32 percent said that retirement savings was an occasional worry. Wachovia's survey -- conducted prior to the election -- included 2,100 consumers with household income or investments exceeding $75,000. It was conducted last fall, before Bush won re-election. 36 percent admitted that they weren't saving enough for retirement, while another 11 percent were worried but were confident that they were pursuing the right course of action. Just 16 percent of the survey participants expressed confidence that they would receive Social Security benefits when they retired. And 50 percent were skeptical of the president's plan for private accounts, saying it was too risky for their retirement savings.

A letter drafted by technology sector lobbyists is making its way through Congress asking lawmakers for support in their battle against expensing stock options. The letter, which is scheduled to arrive on the desk of Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman William Donaldson on Monday, Feb. 14, requests that the regulator delay the June 15, 2005, implementation date, and recommends that the agency conduct an impact study on options expensing. The letter, of which WebCPA received a copy, specifically exhorts the regulator to: o Field test valuation methods "to ensure the methods imposed on all public and private companies make sense and not adversely affect our nation's economy." o Conduct, along with the Labor and Commerce Departments, "a comprehensive impact study before any standard is implemented. There is little doubt that the economic, labor and global competitiveness impact of stock option expensing could be severe." A representative for TechNet -- a bipartisan network of technology sector chief executives who represent more than one million employees -- said that he was aware of the letter, but that the group was not the one behind it. "The SEC has to realize that 14 million people own stock options, so it's not just for top executives. It's a much larger issue than that." In July, House lawmakers overwhelmingly passed their own stock option bill, H.R. 3574, which mandates expensing options only for a company's top five executives.

Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman William Donaldson said that his agency would examine the possibility of modifying or rewriting some current rules, such as the ones requiring stricter internal controls, granting investors power to nominate board members, and governing the methods in which stocks are traded. In published reports, Donaldson said that, while the regulator might be considering any or all of the above-mentioned refinements, the SEC has not abandoned its plans to impose fines for both individual and company wrongdoers. Donaldson said that he hopes the watchdog will approve a measure that would give shareholders more power to elect board members of their choosing, but the rules in their present form may have to be rewritten. A host of business groups have lobbied against the shareholder-nominating proposal, claiming it would cater to special interest groups.

While the current Social Security system is not in crisis mode, it faces serious problems with regard to solvency and sustainability, according to the Government Accountability Office. The auditor general said that if nothing was changed with the 70-year-old program until 2042, "achieving an actuarial balance" would require a 30 percent reduction in benefits or a 43 percent increase in payroll taxes. The GAO also labeled Social Security's problems "a subset of our nation's overall fiscal challenge." Absent reform, the country would have to choose among escalating federal deficits and debt, gargantuan tax increases, or federal budget cuts. However, the GAO warned that when evaluating any reform measure, financial stability should not be the sole criteria. A equitable balance with regards to benefits, as well as administrative and operational issues, also require consideration. The auditor general added that any changes enacted with Social Security should be made "in the context of the broader challenges facing our nation," such as those concerning private pension systems, Medicare and Medicaid.

The American Institute of CPAs has joined with the Labor Department's Women's Bureau in an initiative to help educate women about personal financial management. The partnership will combine the financial education efforts of both organizations -- the AICPA's 360 Degrees of Financial Literacy, and the Women's Bureau's Wi$e Up. The joint effort would provide Labor's Wi$e Up program with the institute's financial experts to support its on-line program and teleconference calls, as well as financial education workshops and conferences. The AICPA's 360 Degrees of Financial Literacy was launched last year with the support of state CPA societies. The program encourages CPAs to volunteer to help educate the public on various financial topics.

Securities and Exchange Commission chief accountant Donald Nicolaisen told lawmakers that the regulator is conducting a top-down examination of mortgage-financing concern Fannie Mae. In prepared remarks before a House subcommittee, Nicolaisen said that, although he could not discuss the ongoing investigation, the SEC staff is "thoroughly" investigating accounting practices at the company. In December, the SEC determined that Fannie Mae's accounting practices didn't comply with generally accepted accounting principles, and told the company to restate its financials for the years 2001 through 2004. As a result, company's chief executive and chief financial officer have departed.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said it will host a roundtable -- possibly in April -- to discuss on how auditors and their smaller publicly traded clients are dealing with the Section 404 internal controls requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley. SEC Chairman William Donaldson has asked for an "appropriate delay" for smaller public issuers and non-U.S. companies whose compliance deadline was scheduled for July 15, 2005 and whose market cap is between $75 million and $700 million. Large U.S. companies, above that threshold, are already required to comply with the internal controls mandate as of Nov. 15, 2004. SEC chief accountant Don Nicolaisen said if a delay is provided, companies should use that time to continue documenting and testing internal controls.

A federal judge here denied a motion to dismiss the WorldCom class-action litigation against its auditor - former Big Five firm Andersen - charging that the plaintiffs had "identified a host of audit failures."

Two former accountants at WorldCom took the stand in Federal District Court in Manhattan in the criminal trial of the company's former chief executive, Bernard Ebbers.

What's the difference between Enron and the United States government?

In an effort to aid smaller publicly traded businesses with internal controls compliance, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations said that it would offer online guidance for internal controls assessment by the summer.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board is going back to that deep, dark place where accounting standards come from - the conceptual framework that underlies it all.

We have been writing on the Conceptual Framework in response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board's announced intent to strengthen it. We've discussed the objective of financial reporting, the political situation and its problems, the overarching importance of cash flows, and the nature of relevance and reliability.